首页> 外文期刊>Journal of socio-economics >Smart tools? A randomized controlled trial on the impact of three different media tools on personal finance
【24h】

Smart tools? A randomized controlled trial on the impact of three different media tools on personal finance

机译:智能工具?三种不同媒体工具对个人理财影响的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

By using a randomized controlled trial we test the impact of three treatments on financial literacy (knowledge, attitudes, reported behavior) among adolescents in Austria. Treatments comprise a documentary movie on debt, an internet exercise and a budgeting smartphone app. It is investigated if particularly the latter two instruments could serve as standalone alternatives (nudges) to conventional teaching interventions. Users of the budgeting app report to check their current account balance significantly more often than the control group. The web exercise, however, neither raises interest in personal finance issues nor significantly increases basic financial knowledge. The documentary movie did not affect attitudes towards saving or private credits. Even if it is only about raising awareness and interest in financial matters among adolescents, the ICT applications tested in this study thus do not lend strong support to policies solely relying on digital "stand-alone" solutions of similar design.
机译:通过使用一项随机对照试验,我们测试了三种治疗方法对奥地利青少年财务知识(知识,态度,举报行为)的影响。待遇包括债务纪录片,互联网锻炼和预算智能手机应用程序。研究特别是后两种工具是否可以作为传统教学干预措施的独立替代品(微调)。与对照组相比,预算应用程序的用户报告要更频繁地检查其当前帐户余额。但是,网络练习既不会引起人们对个人理财问题的兴趣,也不会显着增加基本的理财知识。这部纪录片并没有影响人们对储蓄或私人信贷的态度。即使仅是提高青少年对财务问题的认识和兴趣,本研究中测试的ICT应用也无法为仅依赖于类似设计的数字“独立”解决方案的政策提供强有力的支持。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of socio-economics》 |2018年第6期|104-111|共8页
  • 作者

    Angel Stefan;

  • 作者单位

    WU Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Inst Social Policy, Welthandelspl 1, A-1020 Vienna, Austria;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号