...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Scholarly Publishing >Does (or Should) the First Amendment Trump Copyright?
【24h】

Does (or Should) the First Amendment Trump Copyright?

机译:第一修正案是否(或应该)特朗普版权?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I want to begin this review essay with a biographical note, because Inam known through my writings and speeches mainly as a long-timendefender of copyright, and thus it might appear that I bring to mynreview of this book a prejudicial perspective. But since childhood I havenalways felt strongly about the First Amendment, too, and wrote letters tonthe editor defending freedom of speech and freedom of the press when Inwas still a teenager. The tensions between copyright law and the FirstnAmendment were brought home to me very vividly when I served innthe mid-1980s on both the Copyright and the Freedom to Read Com-nmittees of the Association of American Publishers (AAP), which hadnlong debates over the issues raised in the landmark Supreme Court casenof Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises (1985). So I did not begin readingnthis book with a bias in favour of intellectual property against the FirstnAmendment. The authors’ own bias in reverse, however, did make menmore defensive about copyright than I might otherwise have been, Inmust admit.
机译:我想以个人履历作为这篇评论文章的开头,因为伊南(Inam)在我的著作和演讲中主要是作为版权的长期捍卫者,因此我似乎对这本书的评论带有偏见。但是从孩提时代起,我就对《第一修正案》深有感触,并写信给编辑,捍卫因瓦(Inwa)还是个少年时的言论自由和新闻自由。当我在1980年代中期为美国出版商协会(AAP)的版权和阅读自由委员会服务时,我非常生动地意识到了版权法与《第一修正案》之间的紧张关系。在Harper&Row诉国家企业案(1985)中具有里程碑意义的最高法院案件中提出。因此,我开始阅读本书时并没有偏向于反对《第一修正案》的知识产权。不过,Inmust承认,作者自己的反向偏见确实使男人对版权的防御能力比我本来应该的防御能力高。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Scholarly Publishing 》 |2011年第3期| p.289-306| 共18页
  • 作者

    Sanford G. Thatcher;

  • 作者单位

    David L. Lange and H. Jefferson Powell. No Law: Intellectual Property inthe Image of an Absolute First Amendment;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号