首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Introducing the Open Clause to improve copyright flexibility in cyberspace? Analysis and commentary on the proposed 'two-step test' in the Third Amendment to the Copyright Law of the PRC, in comparison with the EU and the US
【24h】

Introducing the Open Clause to improve copyright flexibility in cyberspace? Analysis and commentary on the proposed 'two-step test' in the Third Amendment to the Copyright Law of the PRC, in comparison with the EU and the US

机译:引入开放条款以提高网络空间的版权灵活性?与欧盟和美国相比,对《中国著作权法》第三修正案中提议的“两步检验”的分析和评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The so called "three-step test", that the limitations and exceptions of copyright shall be allowed in certain special cases, provided that they do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author, grants copyright flexibilities to balance the interests of all stakeholders, especially within the European system of circumscribed limitations and exceptions. This is essential for the domain of computer law, confronted by rapid and unpredictable global technological developments, and is, thus, enshrined in the most important international intellectual property(IP) treaties. Through the proposed third amendment to the Copyright Law of the PRC, the legislature intends to adopt this test while also introducing an open-ended list of limitations and exceptions that constitutes a China-specific "two-step test." This contravenes prima facie the thesis endorsed by the WTO Panel in the case concerning Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act in 2000. In contrast, court decisions in China frequently apply the fair use doctrine of US copyright law, neglecting to consider its peculiar context of the US common law tradition and, thus, unduly expanding the Chinese courts' discretionary power.
机译:所谓的“三步检验”,即在某些特殊情况下,允许版权的限制和例外,只要它们不与作品的正常利用相冲突并且不无理地损害作者的合法利益,赋予版权灵活性以平衡所有利益相关者的利益,尤其是在欧洲限制的限制与例外制度内。这对于计算机法领域是至关重要的,因为它面临着迅速而不可预测的全球技术发展,因此被最重要的国际知识产权条约所约束。通过拟议的《中华人民共和国著作权法》第三修正案,立法机关打算采用该标准,同时还引入了一个开放式的限制与例外清单,这些清单构成了针对中国的“两步检验”。这与WTO专家组在2000年有关《美国版权法》第110(5)条的案件中所支持的表面观点相反。相反,中国的法院判决经常采用美国版权法的合理使用原则,而忽略了考虑美国普通法传统的特殊背景,因此不适当地扩大了中国法院的酌处权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号