...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of scholarly publishing >Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: DEVELOPING COUNTRIES PAY THE PRICE OF WESTERN PREMIUM ACADEMIC OUTPUT
【24h】

Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: DEVELOPING COUNTRIES PAY THE PRICE OF WESTERN PREMIUM ACADEMIC OUTPUT

机译:大型期刊的黄金开放获取出版:发展中国家支付西方高级学术产出的价格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Open access publishing (OAP) makes research output freely available, and several national governments have now made OAP mandatory for all publicly funded research. Gold OAP is a common form of OAP where the author pays an article processing charge (APC) to make the article freely available to readers. However, gold OAP is a cause for concern because it drives a redistribution of valuable research money to support open access papers in mega-journals' with more permissive acceptance criteria. We present a data-driven evaluation of the financial ramifications of gold OAP and provide evidence that gold OAP in mega-journals is biased toward Western industrialized countries. From 2011 to 2015, the period of our data collection, countries with developing economies had a disproportionately greater share of articles published in the lower-tier mega-journals and thus paid article APCs that cross-subsidize publications in the top-tier journals of the same publisher. Conversely, scientists from Western developed countries had a disproportionately greater share of articles published in those same top-tier journals. The global inequity of the cross-subsidizing APC model was demonstrated across five different mega-journals, showing that the issue is a common problem. We need to develop stringent and fair criteria that address the global financial implications of OAP, as publication fees should reflect the real cost of publishing and be transparent for authors.
机译:开放获取出版(OAP)可以免费提供研究成果,并且几个国家的政府现在已将OAP强制用于所有公共资助的研究。黄金OAP是OAP的一种常见形式,其中作者要支付文章处理费(APC),以使读者可以免费获得该文章。但是,黄金OAP引起了人们的关注,因为它推动了宝贵的研究资金的重新分配,以支持具有更宽松的接受标准的大型期刊中的开放获取论文。我们提出了以数据为依据的对黄金OAP的财务影响的评估,并提供证据表明大型新闻稿中的黄金OAP偏向于西方工业化国家。从2011年到2015年,即我们收集数据的时期,发展中经济体国家在较低级别的大型期刊上发表文章的比例所占比例过高,因此,付费的APC对交叉引用的顶级期刊中的出版物进行了补贴。同一个发布者。相反,来自西方发达国家的科学家在相同的顶级期刊上发表的文章所占比例却过高。交叉补贴的APC模型的全球不平等在五个不同的大型期刊中得到了证明,表明该问题是一个普遍的问题。我们需要制定严格和公正的标准来解决OAP对全球财务的影响,因为出版费用应反映出版的实际成本,并对作者透明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号