首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Safety Research >A comprehensive framework for assessing and selecting appropriate scaffolding based on analytic hierarchy process
【24h】

A comprehensive framework for assessing and selecting appropriate scaffolding based on analytic hierarchy process

机译:一个基于层次分析法评估和选择合适脚手架的综合框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Problem: Bamboo scaffolding has been widely used in South China, Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia for many years. Bamboo scaffolding is more economical, but its safety record is relatively poor. Conversely, metal scaffolding is more expensive, but its use in these regions has increased in recent years because it is relatively safe. The assessment and selection of the most appropriate type of scaffolding for a particular construction project is always a concern for project managers. Method: This paper suggests a comprehensive assessment framework that enables project managers to take a number of major quantitative and qualitative factors into consideration when making scaffolding decisions. This framework is based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process methodology and a survey among project managers in Hong Kong. Results: The research reveals that the overall performance of metal scaffolding is believed to be better than bamboo scaffolding. A sensitivity analysis has also been conducted to investigate the impact of various factors on the final decisions. Impact on Industry: The proposed assessment framework can be used as a supporting tool for project managers in the selection of scaffolding for their projects.
机译:问题:竹棚架在华南,香港和东南亚已被广泛使用多年。竹棚架更经济,但其安全记录相对较差。相反,金属脚手架价格昂贵,但由于其相对安全,近年来在这些地区的使用有所增加。对于特定的建筑项目,评估和选择最合适类型的脚手架始终是项目经理关注的问题。方法:本文提出了一个综合的评估框架,该框架使项目经理在做出脚手架决策时可以考虑许多主要的定量和定性因素。该框架基于层次分析法和香港项目经理之间的调查。结果:研究表明,金属脚手架的整体性能被认为比竹脚手架更好。还进行了敏感性分析,以调查各种因素对最终决定的影响。对行业的影响:拟议的评估框架可以用作项目经理选择其项目脚手架的辅助工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号