...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Safety Research >Overhead drilling: Comparing three bases for aligning a drilling jig to vertical
【24h】

Overhead drilling: Comparing three bases for aligning a drilling jig to vertical

机译:架空钻孔:比较三个将钻具对准垂直的底座

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Problem: Drilling overhead into concrete or metal ceilings is a strenuous task done by construction workers to hang ductwork, piping, and electrical equipment. The task is associated with upper body pain and musculoskeletal disorders. Previously, we described a field usability evaluation of a foot lever and inverted drill press intervention devices that were compared to the usual method for overhead drilling. Both interventions were rated as inferior to the usual method based on poor setup time and mobility. Method: Three new interventions, which differed on the design used for aligning the drilling column to vertical, were compared to the usual method for overhead drilling by commercial construction workers (n = 16). Results: The usual method was associated with the highest levels of regional body fatigue and the poorest usability ratings when compared to the three interventions. Conclusion: Overall, the 'Collar Base' intervention design received the best usability ratings. Impact on Industry: Intervention designs developed for overhead drilling may reduce shoulder fatigue and prevent subsequent musculoskeletal disorders. These designs may also be useful for other overhead work such as lifting and supporting materials (e.g., piping, ducts) that are installed near the ceiling. Workplace health and safety interventions may require multiple rounds of field-testing prior to achieving acceptable usability ratings by the end users.
机译:问题:建筑工人要在空中悬吊钻入混凝土或金属天花板是一项艰巨的任务,需要悬挂管道系统,管道和电气设备。该任务与上身疼痛和肌肉骨骼疾病有关。以前,我们描述了脚架和倒置钻床干预设备的现场可用性评估,并将其与架空钻探的常规方法进行了比较。由于设置时间和移动性差,两种干预均被认为不如常规方法。方法:将三种新的干预措施(与将钻柱垂直对齐的设计不同)与商业建筑工人(n = 16)进行架空钻井的常规方法进行了比较。结果:与三种干预措施相比,通常的方法与最高水平的区域身体疲劳和最差的可用性评分相关。结论:总的来说,“ Collar Base”干预设计获得了最佳可用性评级。对行业的影响:针对架空钻探而开发的干预设计可减少肩部疲劳并防止随后的肌肉骨骼疾病。这些设计还可用于其他高架工作,例如安装在天花板附近的起吊和支撑材料(例如管道,管道)。在最终用户获得可接受的可用性等级之前,工作场所的健康和安全干预措施可能需要进行多轮现场测试。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Safety Research》 |2010年第3期|P.247-251|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Ergonomics Program, University of California, San Francisco, 1301 S. 46th Street, Building 163, Richmond, CA 94804, USA;

    rnErgonomics Program, University of California, San Francisco, 1301 S. 46th Street, Building 163, Richmond, CA 94804, USA;

    rnErgonomics Program, University of California, San Francisco, 1301 S. 46th Street, Building 163, Richmond, CA 94804, USA;

    rnLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    construction; overhead; drilling; shoulder; ergonomics; musculoskeletal;

    机译:施工;高架;钻孔;肩;人体工程学肌肉骨骼;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号