...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >Sociological Approaches To Risk: Strong In Analysis But Weak In Policy Influence In Recent Uk Developments
【24h】

Sociological Approaches To Risk: Strong In Analysis But Weak In Policy Influence In Recent Uk Developments

机译:风险的社会学方法:分析力强,但近期英国事态发展对政策的影响微弱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sociological approaches to risk and uncertainty are well-developed. These approaches have played an important role in analysing the significance of risk and uncertainty in modern social life. However, it is approaches based on rational actor perspectives in New Public Management that have become pre-eminent in handling social risks in recent UK policies. This paper tackles the puzzle of why sociology is strong in critique but much weaker in policy influence by pointing to the institutional and contextual standing of approaches which offer a natural home to individual rational actor approaches within UK government.rnApproaches that understand and analyse risk in statistical terms have been particularly influential in many aspects of modern life. A second stream, that has tended to attract less attention, stresses linkages between these approaches and the growth of particular institutions. The challenges faced by modern states in a post-industrial and globalised world are widely discussed. An important response, particularly prominent in the UK and especially in social policy-making, has been New Public Management, associated with an individual rational actor paradigm. Sociological approaches to risk have contributed a number of critiques of this development, however these critiques have failed to gain much purchase on policy-making. One reason is the extent to which approaches which rest on an individual rational actor paradigm are entrenched within the institutional framework of policy-making. This paradigm rests on a different approach to agency than that which is most influential in sociology.
机译:风险和不确定性的社会学方法已经发展成熟。这些方法在分析风险和不确定性在现代社会生活中的重要性方面发挥了重要作用。但是,在新近的英国政策中,正是基于理性行为者观点的方法在处理新的社会风险中占据了主导地位。本文通过指出方法的制度和背景立场,为英国政府内部的个体理性行为者方法提供了自然的家园,从而解决了社会学为何在批评方面强而在政策影响方面却弱得多的难题.rn理解和分析统计风险的方法术语在现代生活的许多方面都特别有影响力。倾向于吸引较少关注的第二流强调这些方法与特定机构的成长之间的联系。在后工业化和全球化的世界中,现代国家面临的挑战得到了广泛讨论。新的公共管理是一项重要的回应,在英国尤其是在社会政策制定中尤为突出,它与个人理性行为者范例相关联。风险的社会学方法促成了对这一发展的许多批评,但是这些批评未能在政策制定中获得很多支持。一个原因是,在某种程度上,基于个体理性行为者范式的方法在政策制定的制度框架内根深蒂固。与社会学中最有影响力的方法相比,这种范式基于不同的代理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号