首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >Beck's creative challenge to class analysis: from the rejection of class to the discovery of risk-class
【24h】

Beck's creative challenge to class analysis: from the rejection of class to the discovery of risk-class

机译:贝克对阶级分析的创造性挑战:从拒绝阶级到发现风险阶级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Beck's rejection of the relevance of class in Risk Society has had an immense impact on both the fields of class analysis and the sociology of risk. In outlining a novel theory of the systemic importance of risks as side-effects and in making bold claims about how the production and distribution of risks are undermining class inequalities, Beck posed a highly influential challenge to both risk and class studies. Beck's impact on class analysis however has not been mainly due to widespread acceptance of his original claims about risk and class; rather, it has been research building upon Beck's work so as to critically depart from his conclusions through which Beck has made his contributions to the study of class. In seeking to identify the impact of Beck's work on the study of risk and class, this paper, firstly, outlines Beck's challenge to class analysis. It then proceeds to identify three key areas of research whose development was motivated by their critical engagement with Beck's work: the literature on riskand the continuity of class; the critical theory of the individualization of class inequality; and the political economy of risk-class. This paper then concludes by critically evaluating Beck's more recent, partial acknowledgement of risk inequalities by arguing that there are significant limitations in his account of class, but that his work continues to offer a valuable opportunity to inspire future work on class and inequality.
机译:贝克拒绝风险社会中的阶级相关性,这对阶级分析和风险社会学领域都产生了巨大的影响。贝克概述了风险作为副作用的系统重要性的新颖理论,并大胆宣称风险的产生和分布如何破坏阶级的不平等现象,贝克对风险和阶级研究提出了极有影响力的挑战。贝克对阶级分析的影响并不是主要是因为人们广泛接受了他最初关于风险和阶级的主张。相反,它是在贝克的工作基础上进行研究的,从而严格偏离了他的结论,贝克由此得出了他对阶级研究做出的贡献。为了确定贝克的工作对风险和阶级研究的影响,本文首先概述了贝克对阶级分析的挑战。然后,它确定了三个关键的研究领域,这些领域的发展是由于他们对贝克的工作的批判性投入:关于风险和阶级连续性的文献;阶级不平等个体化的批判理论;以及风险等级的政治经济学。然后,本文通过对贝克最近对风险不平等的部分认可进行批判性评估,得出结论,认为贝克在课堂上存在重大局限性,但他的工作继续提供了宝贵的机会,激发了关于课堂和不平等的未来工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号