首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk and uncertainty >To bet or not to bet? Decision-making under risk in non-human primates
【24h】

To bet or not to bet? Decision-making under risk in non-human primates

机译:赌还是不赌?非人类灵长类动物有风险的决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Animals deal with predictable and unpredictable events on a daily basis. Yet our knowledge of the cognitive processes involved in decisions remains limited. We tested capuchins, macaques and orang-utans in a food-gambling task to investigate whether or not individuals estimate the chances of different outcomes. Results highlighted that gambling decisions were negatively induced by the probability of losing and the frequency of previous losses, and positively induced by the probability of gaining. Actual decisions were consistent with first order stochastic dominance. The study of second order stochastic dominance revealed that macaques were risk-prone whereas capuchins and orang-utans were risk-adverse. We detected responses comparable to the hot-hand effect, a bias found in humans. Capuchins and orang-utans exhibited probability distortion and loss aversion, which were not systematically found in macaques. Given the heterogeneity among individuals, we implemented mixture models and showed that attitudes towards risk and probabilities play complementary and different roles in the three species.
机译:动物每天都会处理可预测和不可预测的事件。然而,我们对决策所涉及的认知过程的知识仍然有限。我们在一项食物赌博任务中测试了卷尾猴,猕猴和猩猩,以调查个人是否估计不同结果的机会。结果表明,赌博决策是由失败的可能性和先前损失的频率引起的,而归因于获得的可能性。实际决策与一阶随机优势一致。对二阶随机优势度的研究表明,猕猴容易发生风险,而卷尾猴和猩猩则容易发生风险。我们检测到的反应可与热手效应相媲美,这是人类发现的偏见。卷尾猴和猩猩表现出概率失真和损失厌恶,这在猕猴中没有系统地发现。考虑到个体之间的异质性,我们实施了混合模型,并表明了对风险和概率的态度在这三个物种中起着互补和不同的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号