...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk and uncertainty >Spatial externalities and risk in interdependent security games
【24h】

Spatial externalities and risk in interdependent security games

机译:相互依赖的安全博弈中的空间外部性和风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Individuals regularly invest in self-protection to reduce the risk of an adverse event. The effectiveness of self-protection often depends on the actions of other economic agents and can be modeled as a stochastic coordination game with multiple Pareto-ranked equilibria. We use lab experiments to analyze tacit coordination in stochastic games with two kinds of interdependencies in payoffs: "non-spatial" in which every agent's action has an impact on the risk faced by every other agent, and "spatial" in which agents only impact the risk faced by their immediate neighbors. We also compare behavior in the stochastic games to deterministic versions of the same games. We find that coordination on the payoff-dominant equilibrium is significantly easier in the deterministic games than in the stochastic games and that spatial interdependencies lead to greater levels of coordination in the deterministic game but not in the stochastic game. The difficulty with coordination observed in the stochastic games has important implications for many real-world examples of interdependent security and also illustrates the importance of not relying on data from deterministic experiments to analyze behavior in settings with risk.
机译:个人定期投资自我保护以减少发生不良事件的风险。自我保护的有效性通常取决于其他经济主体的行为,并且可以被建模为具有多个帕累托等级均衡的随机协调博弈。我们使用实验室实验来分析具有两种相互依赖的收益的随机博弈中的默认协调:“非空间”,其中每个代理的行为都会影响其他代理所面临的风险;“空间”,其中代理只会影响其他代理他们的直接邻居面临的风险。我们还将随机游戏中的行为与相同游戏的确定性版本进行比较。我们发现,与随机博弈相比,在确定性博弈中,以收益为主导的均衡的协调要容易得多,而且空间相互依赖性导致在确定性博弈中的协调程度更高,但在随机博弈中却没有。随机游戏中观察到的协调困难对于许多相互依赖的安全性的真实示例具有重要意义,并且还说明了不依赖于确定性实验中的数据来分析具有风险的行为的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号