首页> 外文期刊>The journal of risk and insurance >Catastrophe Risk Financing in the United States and the European Union: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Regulatory Approaches
【24h】

Catastrophe Risk Financing in the United States and the European Union: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Regulatory Approaches

机译:美国和欧盟的巨灾风险融资:替代性监管方式的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The regulation of insurance companies in the United States and the European Union (EU) continues to evolve in response to market forces and the changing nature of risk but with somewhat different philosophies and at different rates. One important area where both economic realities and markets are changing is catastrophe risk and its financing. This article examines and compares regulatory and other government policies in the United States and the EU generally and their approaches to the financing of catastrophe risk specifically. It is important to understand the fundamental differences between the two systems to gain insights into their disparate treatment of catastrophe risk financing. Although policies could be improved in both jurisdictions, we argue that the much greater reform is needed in the United States relative to the EU regulatory policies that are being developed. We offer recommendations on how U.S. policies could be significantly improved as well as comment on issues facing the EU. We conclude with some observations on the needs for further progress in the U.S. and EU regulatory systems.
机译:美国和欧洲联盟(EU)的保险公司监管不断发展,以响应市场力量和不断变化的风险性质,但其理念有所不同,利率也有所不同。经济现实和市场都在变化的一个重要领域是巨灾风险及其融资。本文研究并比较了美国和欧盟的监管政策和其他政府政策,以及它们在巨灾风险融资方面的具体方法。重要的是要了解两个系统之间的根本差异,以深入了解它们对巨灾风险融资的不同处理。尽管两个司法管辖区的政策都可以改进,但我们认为相对于正在制定的欧盟监管政策,美国需要进行更大的改革。我们提供有关如何大幅改善美国政策的建议,并就欧盟面临的问题发表评论。最后,我们对美国和欧盟监管体系进一步发展的必要性提出了一些看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号