首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging >Contradiction in the Contemporary Study of Faith Matters: Negation and Affirmation via a Historical Perspective
【24h】

Contradiction in the Contemporary Study of Faith Matters: Negation and Affirmation via a Historical Perspective

机译:信仰问题当代研究中的矛盾:基于历史视角的否定与肯定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We agree with Dr. Glicksman that faith matters cannot be studied in the same way as other universal aspects of the human existence, and that we cannot assume that certain faith measures are applicable across all faiths. Despite its limitations, empirical faith research is valuable in understanding the role of religion/spirituality for the human condition. We propose the following remedies: develop cultural sensitive faith measures with psychometric properties in different beliefs; examine multifaceted, positive, null, and negative effects of different faith factors; and combine historical/phenomenological approaches to the faith study with quantitative and qualitative research. Finally, scientific investigators should collaborate with scholars in the humanities.
机译:我们同意格里克斯曼博士的观点,即信仰的研究不能与人类生存的其他普遍方面以同样的方式进行研究,并且我们不能假设某些信仰措施适用于所有信仰。尽管有其局限性,但经验信仰研究对于理解宗教/灵性对人类状况的作用非常有价值。我们提出以下补救措施:开发具有不同信仰心理特性的文化敏感信仰措施;检查不同信仰因素的多方面,正面,无效和负面影响;并将信仰研究的历史/现象学方法与定量和定性研究相结合。最后,科研人员应与人文学科领域的学者合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号