首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Religion and Health >How Religious Coping is Used Relative to Other Coping Strategies Depends on the Individual’s Level of Religiosity and Spirituality
【24h】

How Religious Coping is Used Relative to Other Coping Strategies Depends on the Individual’s Level of Religiosity and Spirituality

机译:相对于其他应对策略,如何使用宗教应对方式取决于个人的宗教信仰和灵性水平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Results from empirical studies on the role of religiosity and spirituality in dealing with stress are frequently at odds, and the present study investigated whether level of religiosity and spirituality is related to the way in which religious coping is used relative to other coping strategies. A sample of 616 university undergraduate students completed the Brief COPE (Carver in Int J Behav Med 4:92–100, 1997) questionnaire and was classified into groups of participants with lower and higher levels of religiosity and spirituality, as measured by the WHOQOL-SRPB (WHOQOL-SRPB Group in Soc Sci Med 62:1486–1497, 2006) instrument. For participants with lower levels, religious coping tended to be associated with maladaptive or avoidant coping strategies, compared to participants with higher levels, where religious coping was more closely related to problem-focused coping, which was also supported by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The results of the present study thus illustrate that investigating the role of religious coping requires more complex approaches than attempting to assign it to one higher order factor, such as problem- or emotion-focused coping, and that the variability of findings reported by previous studies on the function of religious coping may partly be due to variability in religiosity and spirituality across samples.
机译:关于宗教和灵性在应对压力中的作用的实证研究结果经常不一致,并且本研究调查了宗教和灵性的水平是否与使用宗教应对方式相对于其他应对策略有关。 616名大学生的样本完成了简短的COPE(Carver in Int J Behav Med 4:92-100,1997年)调查问卷,并根据WHOQOL-L的测量方法分为宗教和灵性水平较低和较高的参与者组。 SRPB(WHOQOL-SRPB Group in Soc Sci Med 62:1486-1497,2006)仪器。对于较低水平的参与者,与较高水平的参与者相比,宗教应对倾向于与适应不良或避免的应对策略相关,在较高水平的参与者中,宗教应对与以问题为中心的应对更密切相关,这也得到了多组验证性因素分析的支持。因此,本研究的结果表明,调查宗教应对的作用比尝试将其分配给一个高阶因素(例如以问题或情绪为中心的应对)需要更复杂的方法,并且以前的研究报告的发现存在差异宗教应对功能的变化可能部分归因于样本之间宗教和灵性的差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Religion and Health》 |2012年第4期|p.1137-1151|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health &amp Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, North Shore Campus, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand;

    Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health &amp Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, North Shore Campus, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand;

    Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health &amp Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, North Shore Campus, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand;

    Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health &amp Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, North Shore Campus, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Coping strategies; Religious coping; Religiosity; Spirituality; Brief COPE; WHOQOL-SRPB;

    机译:应对策略;宗教应对;宗教信仰;灵性;简短应对;WHOQOL-SRPB;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号