首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Religion, Disability & Health >On Becoming Human: Jean Vanier, Carl Rogers and James Alison on Disabilities, Acceptance, and a Noncompetitive Theological Anthropology
【24h】

On Becoming Human: Jean Vanier, Carl Rogers and James Alison on Disabilities, Acceptance, and a Noncompetitive Theological Anthropology

机译:关于“成为人类”:让·凡尼尔,卡尔·罗杰斯和詹姆斯·艾莉森,关于残疾,接受和非竞争性神学人类学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past century, theologians and ethicists have expressed unease with the growing problem of competition in human relationships. While most agree that competition dissolves relationships of fidelity and trust between people, many have argued on the basis of the political mythology of social contract theory that competition is a natural, albeit sad, fact of being human. This article examines and aligns three responses to the problem of competition in human relationships from Jean Vanier, Carl Rogers, and James Alison. In contrast to the view that human beings are naturally competitive, Vanier, Rogers, and Alison have each reinterpreted human being as depending on the cultivation of noncompetitive relationships that require interdependence in vulnerability, acceptance of others, and a vision of fully human life compatible with and modeled in the experience of disability. Vanier and Rogers developed their anthropologies in relation to the L’Arche communities and psychotherapy respectively, and did not concentrate specifically on traditional systematic theological topics. Alison, however, has focused on traditional theological topics, particularly redemption. This essay suggests that the noncompetitive anthropology developed in Vanier and Rogers helpfully complements the doctrine of redemption developed by Alison and so assists in changing the focus of Christian discussions of salvation from adversarial, forensic and competitive accounts of the Atonement to practice-oriented and social views of becoming human in belonging with others.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDSJames Alison, Carl Rogers, Jean Vanier, disabilities, noncompetition, theologicalRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2012.645627
机译:在过去的一个世纪中,神学家和伦理学家对人际关系竞争日益加剧的问题表示不安。尽管大多数人都认为竞争消除了人与人之间忠诚和信任的关系,但许多人根据社会契约论的政治神话认为,竞争是自然的,尽管是可悲的,是人类的事实。本文研究了Jean Vanier,Carl Rogers和James Alison对人际关系竞争问题的三种回应并进行了整理。与人类天生具有竞争性的观点相反,Vanier,Rogers和Alison分别将人类重新解释为依赖于非竞争性关系的培养,这种关系要求脆弱性相互依存,接受他人以及与人类完全相容的愿景并以残疾经验为蓝本。瓦尼尔(Vanier)和罗杰斯(Rogers)分别发展了与拉奇(LâArche)社区和心理治疗有关的人类学,并且没有专门关注传统的系统神学主题。但是,艾莉森(Alison)专注于传统的神学主题,尤其是救赎。本文认为,瓦尼尔和罗杰斯所发展的非竞争人类学有助于补充艾莉森所提出的救赎学说,因此有助于将基督教救赎讨论的重点从对赎罪的对抗性,法医学和竞争性论述转变为以实践为导向的社会观点成为他人与他人的归属的人。查看全文下载全文James Alison,Carl Rogers,Jean Vanier,残疾,不竞争,神学相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati, Delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2012.645627

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号