首页> 外文期刊>Journal of regulatory economics >Weak versus strong net neutrality: correction and clarification
【24h】

Weak versus strong net neutrality: correction and clarification

机译:弱中性与强中性净中性:更正和澄清

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We correct and clarify the results of Gans (J Regul Econ 47:183-200, 2015) regarding the effects of net neutrality regulation on equilibrium outcomes in settings where a content provider sells its services to consumers for a fee. We examine both pricing and investment effects. We extend the earlier paper's result that weak forms of net neutrality are ineffective and also show that even a strong form of net neutrality may be ineffective. In addition, we demonstrate that, when strong net neutrality does affect the equilibrium outcome, it may harm efficiency by distorting both ISP and content provider investment and service-quality choices.
机译:我们更正和澄清了Gans的结果(J Regul Econ 47:183-200,2015),其中关于内容提供商在有偿向消费者出售其服务的环境中净中立性监管对均衡结果的影响。我们同时研究了定价和投资效果。我们扩展了较早的论文的结果,即弱网络中立形式无效,并且还表明,即使是强形式的网络中立也可能无效。此外,我们证明,当强大的网络中立性确实影响均衡结果时,它可能会扭曲ISP和内容提供商的投资以及服务质量选择,从而损害效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号