首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economics >Voters' private valuation of candidates' quality
【24h】

Voters' private valuation of candidates' quality

机译:选民对候选人素质的私人评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Different voters might have different valuations of candidates' qualitative features. We argue that this intuitive fact acts as a strong stabilizing force in electoral competition dynamics when candidates are office motivated (pure strategy equilibria may exist, unlike when all voters favor the same candidate). Perhaps more importantly, it affects candidates' platform moderation incentives in a rather intriguing manner. When voters are evenly split, in terms of their candidates' quality valuations, then both candidates have incentives to locate sufficiently near - but not necessarily exactly at - the center of the policy space. However, as the number of voters who favor the same candidate rises, (maximum) equilibrium differentiation follows a non-trivial U-shaped pattern. It is first decreasing and then increasing in the fraction of voters who prefer the more popular candidate. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:不同的选民可能会对候选人的素质有不同的评价。我们认为,当候选人是出于办公室动机时,这种直观的事实就成为选举竞争动态中的强大稳定力量(与所有选民都青睐同一候选人时不同,可能存在纯粹的战略均衡)。也许更重要的是,它以一种相当有趣的方式影响了候选人的平台审核激励措施。当选民在候选人的素质评估方面平均分配时,两名候选人都有动机将自己定位在政策空间的中心附近,但不一定准确。但是,随着支持同一候选人的选民人数增加,(最大)均衡分化将遵循非平凡的U形模式。首先是选民的减少,然后是选民的增加。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号