...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economic theory >Should Educational Policies Be Regressive?
【24h】

Should Educational Policies Be Regressive?

机译:教育政策应该退步吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, we study optimal educational policies when the ability to benefit from education is private information. We extend the framework of De Fraja (2002) in two directions. First, we replace his specification of the government's budget constraint, which prevents the government to use tax revenues from an older generation to subsidize the education of a younger generation, by the usual one. We show that the optimal educational policies achieve the first best, are not regressive, and can be decentralized through Pigou-vian taxes and credit provision. Second, we consider utility functions that are not quasi-linear. In this case, we show that the first best can no longer be reached, education may not be monotonic in ability, and progressivities of education are locally welfare-improving.
机译:在本文中,我们研究当受教育的能力是私人信息时的最佳教育政策。我们从两个方向扩展了De Fraja(2002)的框架。首先,我们替换了他对政府预算约束的规定,该规定阻止了政府通过通常的方式利用老一辈的税收来补贴年轻一代的教育。我们表明,最佳的教育政策可以达到最佳,并且不会退步,并且可以通过庇古税和信贷提供权进行下放。其次,我们考虑效用函数不是准线性的。在这种情况下,我们表明无法再达到最佳状态,教育的能力可能不会单调,并且教育的进步会改善当地的福利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of public economic theory》 |2012年第4期|p.601-623|共23页
  • 作者单位

    Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk,Philadelphia, PA 19104;

    Graduate School of Economics, Getulio Vargas Foundation, Praia de Botafogo 190, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 22253-900;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号