...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of productivity analysis >The cost of Corporate Social Responsibility: the case of the Community Reinvestment Act
【24h】

The cost of Corporate Social Responsibility: the case of the Community Reinvestment Act

机译:企业社会责任的成本:《社区再投资法》的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) cost minimization model is employed to estimate the cost to thrift institutions of achieving a rating of 'outstanding' under the anti-redlining Community Reinvestment Act, which is viewed as an act of voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). There is no difference in overall cost efficiency between 'outstanding' and minimally compliant 'satisfactory' thrifts. However, the sources of cost inefficiency do differ, and an 'outstanding' rating involves annual extra cost of $6.547 million or, 1.2% of total costs. This added cost is the shadow price of CSR since it is not an explicit output or input in the DEA cost model. Before and after-tax rates of return are the same for the 'outstanding' and 'satisfactory' thrifts, which implies a recoupment of the extra cost. The findings are consistent with CSR as a management choice based on balancing marginal cost and marginal revenue. An incidental finding is that larger thrifts are less efficient.
机译:数据包络分析(DEA)成本最小化模型用于估算节约机构获得的费用,这些机构根据《反红线社区再投资法》获得“杰出”评级,该法被视为自愿性企业社会责任(CSR) 。 “杰出”产品和最低要求的“令人满意”产品之间的总体成本效率没有差异。然而,成本效率低下的根源确实有所不同,“杰出”评级涉及每年654.7万美元的额外成本,占总成本的1.2%。该增加的成本是CSR的影子价格,因为它不是DEA成本模型中的明确输出或输入。对于“出色”和“令人满意”的节俭产品,税前和税后的回报率是相同的,这意味着可以收回额外成本。研究结果与基于平衡边际成本和边际收益的企业社会责任作为管理选择相一致。一个偶然的发现是,节俭越大效率越低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号