...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of product innovation management >Perspective: Trends And Drivers Of Success In Npd Practices: Results Of The 2003 Pdma Best Practices Study
【24h】

Perspective: Trends And Drivers Of Success In Npd Practices: Results Of The 2003 Pdma Best Practices Study

机译:观点:NPd实践的成功趋势和驱动因素:2003年Pdma最佳实践研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Since 1990, the Product Development & Management Association (PDMA) has sponsored best practice research projects to identify trends in new product development (NPD) management practices and to discern which practices are associated with higher degrees of success. The objective of this ongoing research is to assist managers in determining how to improve their own product development methods and practices. This paper presents results, recommendations, and implications for NPD practice stemming from PDMA's third best practices study, which was conducted in 2003. In the eight years since the previous best practices study was conducted, firms have become slightly more conservative in the portfolio of projects, with lower percentages of the total number of projects in the new-to-the-world and new-to-the-firm categories. Although success rates and development efficiencies have remained stable, this more conservative approach to NPD seems to have negatively impacted the sales and profits impact of the new products that have been commercialized. As formal processes for NPD are now the norm, attention is moving to managing the multiple projects across the portfolio in a more orchestrated manner. Finally, firms are implementing a wide variety of software support tools for various aspects of NPD. NPD areas still seriously in need of improved management include idea management, project leadership and training, cross-functional training and team communication support, and innovation support and leadership by management. In terms of aspects of NPD management that differentiate the "best from the rest," the findings indicate that the best firms emphasize and integrate their innovation strategy across all the levels of the firm, better support their people and team communications, conduct extensive experimentation, and use numerous kinds of new methods and techniques to support NPD. All companies appear to continue to struggle with the recording of ideas and making them readily available to others in the organization, even the best. What remains unclear is whether there is a preferable approach for organizing the NPD endeavor, as no one organizational approach distinguished top NPD performers.
机译:自1990年以来,产品开发与管理协会(PDMA)赞助了最佳实践研究项目,以识别新产品开发(NPD)管理实践的趋势,并确定哪些实践与更高程度的成功相关。这项正在进行的研究的目的是帮助经理确定如何改进自己的产品开发方法和实践。本文介绍了来自PDMA于2003年进行的第三次最佳实践研究的结果,建议和对NPD实践的影响。自从进行先前的最佳实践研究以来的八年中,公司在项目组合中变得更加保守,在“新世界”和“新公司”类别中的项目总数中所占的百分比较低。尽管成功率和开发效率一直保持稳定,但是这种针对NPD的更为保守的方法似乎已经对已经商业化的新产品的销售和利润影响产生了负面影响。现在,NPD的正式流程已成为规范,人们的注意力正在转移到以更有组织的方式管理整个投资组合中的多个项目。最后,公司正在为NPD的各个方面实施各种各样的软件支持工具。 NPD仍然迫切需要改进管理的领域包括想法管理,项目领导和培训,跨职能培训和团队沟通支持以及创新支持和管理层领导。在NPD管理方面,“最好的与其余的”有所不同,研究结果表明,最好的公司强调并整合公司各个层面的创新策略,更好地支持其人员和团队沟通,进行广泛的实验,并使用多种新方法和技术来支持NPD。所有公司似乎都在努力记录创意,并使组织中的其他人甚至最好的人随时可以使用它们。尚不清楚的是,是否有一种更好的方法来组织NPD努力,因为没有一种组织方法可以区分NPD的杰出表现者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号