...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of product innovation management >Does Spatial Ambidexterity Pay Off? On the Benefits of Geographic Proximity Between Technology Exploitation and Exploration
【24h】

Does Spatial Ambidexterity Pay Off? On the Benefits of Geographic Proximity Between Technology Exploitation and Exploration

机译:空间二元性能得到回报吗?论技术开发与探索之间的地理优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While most scholars tend to agree that it is worthwhile for firms to strive for ambidexterity, less consensus exists on how to organize simultaneously for exploration and exploitation. Although firms increasingly conduct R&D activities in multiple locations and countries, prior ambidexterity research has ignored a geographical dimension in explaining the ambidexterity-performance relationship. In this paper, we develop and validate the concept of spatial ambidexterity, which we define as the degree to which firms pursue technology exploration and exploitation in proximate locations. We argue that both activities benefit from proximity as firms will increase their ability to enact cross-fertilization opportunities and synergies between explorative and exploitative technological activities. Relying on a panel dataset (1995-2003) of the technological activities of 156 large R&D intensive European, U.S. and Japanese firms, we examine the degree to which technology exploration and exploitation activities are pursued simultaneously in similar or different geographical regions. Patent data are used to construct indicators of technology exploration and exploitation activities. Spatial ambidexterity is measured as the degree to which global technology exploration and exploitation activities are pursued in proximity. Our analysis confirms that firms exhibiting greater geographic proximity between technology exploration and exploitation activities display an elevated level of technological performance. Both technology activities of an explorative and exploitative nature appear to benefit from spatial proximity.
机译:尽管大多数学者倾向于认为公司值得努力实现模棱两可,但对于如何同时组织勘探和开发活动却缺乏共识。尽管公司越来越多地在多个位置和国家开展研发活动,但是先前的灵活性研究在解释灵活性与绩效关系时忽略了地理范围。在本文中,我们开发并验证了空间模糊度的概念,我们将其定义为公司在邻近位置进行技术探索和开发的程度。我们认为,这两种活动都受益于邻近性,因为公司将增强制定交叉受精机会的能力以及探索性和开发性技术活动之间的协同作用。依靠156家大型研发密集型欧洲,美国和日本公司的技术活动的面板数据集(1995-2003),我们研究了在相似或不同地理区域中同时进行技术勘探和开发活动的程度。专利数据用于构建技术探索和开发活动的指标。空间歧义度是衡量全球技术探索和开发活动在附近进行的程度。我们的分析证实,在技术探索与开发活动之间具有更大地理距离的公司显示出较高的技术绩效水平。具有探索性和开发性的两种技术活动似乎都受益于空间邻近性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of product innovation management》 |2018年第2期|151-163|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Managerial Econ Strategy & Innovat, Leuven, Belgium;

    Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Managerial Econ Strategy & Innovat, Innovat Management, Leuven, Belgium;

    Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Managerial Econ Strategy & Innovat, Leuven, Belgium;

    Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Managerial Econ Strategy & Innovat MSI, Fac Business & Econ, Innovat & Org, Leuven, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号