首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Portfolio Management >The Divergence of High- and Low-Frequency Estimation: Causes and Consequences
【24h】

The Divergence of High- and Low-Frequency Estimation: Causes and Consequences

机译:高频和低频估计的差异:成因和后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most of us use monthly or higher-frequency returns to estimate the inputs for portfolio construction and risk models, even when our investment horizons are much longer. We assume, either implicitly or explicitly, that standard deviations scale with the square root of time and correlations estimated from higher-frequency returns are similar to correlations estimated from lower-frequency returns. And we're not alone. The "square root of time" rule for annualizing standard deviation is everywhere. It's hard-coded into risk management and optimization software packages, mandated by the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS), and embedded in the Blaek-Scholes equation. But surprising new evidence suggests that it is often wrong.In this report, Will Kinlaw, Mark Kritzman and David Turkington analyze the causes and consequences of this discrepancy. They advise caution when extrapolating high-frequency risk estimates to long-term scenarios, drawing on divergence between US and emerging-market stocks from 1990 to 2013 to illustrate the dangers of this approach.
机译:即使我们的投资期限更长,我们大多数人还是使用每月或更高频率的收益来估算投资组合建设和风险模型的投入。我们隐式或显式地假设标准偏差与时间的平方根成比例,并且从高频返回估计的相关与从低频返回估计的相关相似。而且我们并不孤单。将标准差年化的“时间平方根”规则随处可见。根据《全球投资绩效标准》(GIPS)的要求,它被硬编码到风险管理和优化软件包中,并嵌入到Blaek-Scholes公式中。但是令人惊讶的新证据表明这常常是错误的。在本报告中,威尔·金劳(Will Kinlaw),马克·克里兹曼(Mark Kritzman)和戴维·图金顿(David Turkington)分析了这种差异的原因和后果。他们在将高频风险估算值推算至长期情景中时应谨慎行事,并利用1990年至2013年美国股市与新兴市场股市之间的差异来说明这种做法的危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号