首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Political Ideologies >Is there a proper way to use the voluntary servitude hypothesis?
【24h】

Is there a proper way to use the voluntary servitude hypothesis?

机译:是否有使用自愿奴役假说的适当方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores the problem of voluntary servitude identified by Etienne de La Boétie in his Discours de la servitude volontaire. The article argues that there is a wrong way and a right way to interpret La Boétie's claim that we voluntarily submit to the power of the tyrant. The wrong way—promulgated by a whole tradition of western political philosophy—uses the voluntary servitude thesis to make a claim about the inevitability of domination and the unsuitability of people for self-rule, thus obscuring its true emancipatory gesture. The right way to use La Boétie's thesis is to lead us on an investigation of the risks and pitfalls we must avoid in our pursuit of liberty.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2011.607299
机译:本文探讨了埃蒂安·德拉伯蒂(Etienne de LaBoétie)在他的《奴役之门》中发现的自愿奴役问题。该文章认为,解释拉博蒂的主张是错误的,正确的方法是我们自愿服从暴君的权力。西方政治哲学的整个传统所宣告的错误方法是使用自愿奴役论点来宣称统治的必然性和人们不适合自我统治的主张,从而掩盖了其真正的解放姿态。使用LaBoétie论文的正确方法是引导我们研究在追求自由时必须避免的风险和陷阱。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact ::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2011.607299

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号