首页> 外文期刊>Journal of policy modeling >Twin deficits, growth and stability of the US economy: Editor's introduction
【24h】

Twin deficits, growth and stability of the US economy: Editor's introduction

机译:双赤字,美国经济的增长与稳定:编辑介绍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This Special Issue of the Journal of Policy Modeling on "Twin deficits, growth and stability of the US economy" arose out of the session that I organized and chaired at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association held in Boston on January 8, 2006. The term "twin deficits" was coined in the early 1980s during the Reagan presidency, when both budget and trade deficits soared. Those who believe that budget and trade deficits are "twins" believe that large US budget deficits lead to higher interest rates in the United States, which attracts funds from abroad, and these in turn lead to an overvaluation of the dollar and to US trade and current account deficits. However, from basic open-economy macro, we know that budget deficits lead to trade deficits only if budget deficits are larger than net private domestic savings. Since budget deficits, net private domestic savings, and trade deficits are jointly or simultaneously determined, there is no reason for budget deficits to necessarily or directly lead to trade deficits (i.e. for them to be twins). In fact, inspection of the time series data show that US budget and trade deficits seemed to move together (i.e. to behave as twins) only in the 1980s and from 2001 to 2004, but not in the 1990s and in 2005. "Growth" is included in the title of the Special Issue because a tax reform that reduces taxes can stimulate growth only up to a point. Finally, unsustainable US trade deficits can be dangerous because they could lead to a collapse of the dollar, higher interest rates and lower growth in the United States, and to world economic instability. These are the topics, which the papers in this special issue address.
机译:我在2006年1月8日于波士顿举行的美国经济协会年会上组织并主持的会议上发表了有关“美国双赤字,经济增长和稳定”的政策建模杂志的特刊。 “双赤字”一词是在1980年代初期里根总统任期内提出的,当时预算赤字和贸易赤字均猛增。那些认为预算和贸易赤字是“双胞胎”的人认为,美国的巨额预算赤字会导致美国的利率上升,从而吸引来自国外的资金,而这些反过来又导致美元和美国贸易的高估。经常账户赤字。但是,从基本的开放式经济宏观来看,我们知道只有当预算赤字大于私人国内储蓄净额时,预算赤字才会导致贸易赤字。由于预算赤字,私人国内储蓄净额和贸易赤字是共同或同时确定的,因此没有理由使预算赤字必然或直接导致贸易赤字(即,它们是双胞胎)。实际上,对时间序列数据的检查表明,美国的预算赤字和贸易赤字似乎仅在1980年代和2001年至2004年一起移动(即表现为双胞胎),而在1990年代和2005年则没有。包括在《特刊》标题中,因为减税的税收改革只能在一定程度上刺激增长。最后,不可持续的美国贸易赤字可能是危险的,因为它们可能导致美元贬值,美国利率上升和增长下降,以及世界经济不稳定。这些是本期特刊中涉及的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号