首页> 外文期刊>Journal of policy modeling >An Economic Model-based Analysis of Climate and Energy Policy
【24h】

An Economic Model-based Analysis of Climate and Energy Policy

机译:基于经济模型的气候与能源政策分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

No one would disagree the necessity of preserving the environment while promoting economic growth. However, no informed decision on any energy and environmental policy can be made without knowing its economic costs and environmental effectiveness. Against this background, several key empirical and design issues come to mind, of both scientific interest and policy relevance. rn1. Given that emissions trading scheme has been a pillar in the EU climate policy and is going to be core in any future U.S. climate policy, how can that scheme be designed to avoid imposing unnecessarily high costs? rn2. Given that coal creates fewer energy security concerns than do oil and natural gas because of its wide distribution among developed and developing countries, how will that industry be affected by future carbon constraints? rn3. Given the crucial role that technology is playing in avoiding dangerous climate change impacts, can history shed light on the contribution of technological change to greenhouse gas emissions so that we can infer the size of the challenges ahead? rn4. Will the current impasse in international climate negotiations promote another look at alternatives to the Kyoto-style targets and timetables approach?
机译:没有人会反对在促进经济增长的同时保护环境的必要性。但是,在不了解能源和环境政策的经济成本和环境效益的情况下,无法做出明智的决定。在这种背景下,人们想到了一些具有科学意义和政策相关性的关键经验和设计问题。 rn1。鉴于排放交易计划一直是欧盟气候政策的支柱,并将成为未来任何美国气候政策的核心,那么如何设计该计划以避免不必要的高昂成本? rn2。鉴于煤炭在发达国家和发展中国家之间的广泛分布,其产生的能源安全问题比石油和天然气要少,该行业将如何受到未来碳限制的影响? rn3。鉴于技术在避免危险的气候变化影响方面所起的关键作用,历史能否揭示技术变化对温室气体排放的贡献,以便我们可以推断出未来挑战的规模? rn4。当前国际气候谈判的僵局是否会促使人们重新审视京都式目标和时间表方法的替代方案?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of policy modeling》 |2009年第3期|359-361|共3页
  • 作者

    ZhongXiang Zhang;

  • 作者单位

    Research Program, East-West Center, 1601 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96848-1601, USA Center for Energy Economics and Strategy Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai, China China Centre for Regional Economic Research, Peking University, Beijing, China Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号