首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >Undermining Devolution at Depth: The Implications for the Devolution of Environmental Powers of the Infrastructure Act 2015 and the Practice of Hydraulic Fracturing
【24h】

Undermining Devolution at Depth: The Implications for the Devolution of Environmental Powers of the Infrastructure Act 2015 and the Practice of Hydraulic Fracturing

机译:破坏深度转移:《 2015年基础设施法》对环境权力转移的影响和水力压裂实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is not hyperbolic to state that the process of hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" has become one of the most controversial methods of hydrocarbon extraction in the world.~2 Alongside other sources such as the oil sands of Alberta, Canada and drilling within the Arctic circle, it has become known as an "extreme energy" source and emblematic of our continued reliance on oil and gas for energy and material production. ~3 There is considerable debate amongst States internationally about the validity of using such sources, and indeed the use of oil and gas at all, particularly in relation to energy production. These debates also come at a time when pressure on the use of plastics, the production of which is reliant on hydrocarbon supply, is at its utmost. As such, the question of whether we should be using such sources at all or striving to wean ourselves from this multi-faceted resource is at the forefront of policy debates the world over. This complex argument is, however, not exclusively supranational. The policy of devolved governments in the UK varies on the utility of hydrocarbon resources found in shale rock formations and the validity of opting to extract them. Policy variance, the nature of the hydraulic fracturing extraction process and existing legislative provisions regarding its licensing have inadvertently created a standoff over the use of these oil and gas resources. This is one which might be broken by undermining (literally and metaphorically) powers devolved to the Welsh Government by that in Westminster. This piece hopes to outline the nature of this potential loophole which emerges from legislation created to assist in the development of hydraulic fracturing projects in the UK. Following from this, it will consider the wider issue of the inadequacy of the existing regulatory framework for these projects which this loophole highlights. Finally, it assesses what is needed to ensure that this complex and fragmented licensing process does not result in an abuse of environmental justice, as well as the powers constitutionally afforded to the devolved Government of Wales.
机译:可以肯定地说,水力压裂或“压裂”工艺已成为世界上最具争议的油气开采方法之一。〜2除其他来源外,例如加拿大艾伯塔省的油砂和北极地区的钻探在世界范围内,它已被称为“极端能源”来源,并且象征着我们继续依赖石油和天然气进行能源和材料生产。 〜3在国际上,各国之间就使用此类资源的有效性以及根本上完全使用石油和天然气,特别是在能源生产方面的使用进行了辩论。这些辩论也正值塑料使用压力最大的时候,塑料的生产依赖于碳氢化合物的供应。因此,我们到底应该使用这种资源还是努力摆脱这种多方面的资源,这是全世界政策辩论的首要问题。但是,这种复杂的论点并不完全是超国家的。英国下放政府的政策在页岩岩层中发现的碳氢化合物资源的实用性和选择开采它们的有效性方面有所不同。政策差异,水力压裂开采工艺的性质以及有关许可的现行法律规定在无意中造成了对这些油气资源使用的僵持。这可能是由于削弱了威斯敏斯特政府转交给威尔士政府的权力(从字面上和隐喻上)而被打破的。这篇文章希望概述潜在漏洞的性质,该漏洞源于为协助英国水力压裂项目的发展而制定的立法。在此之后,它将考虑更广泛的问题,即漏洞突出显示的这些项目的现有监管框架不足。最后,它评估了确保该复杂而分散的许可程序不会导致滥用环境正义以及宪法赋予威尔士下放政府的权力所需要的内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号