首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >R. (on the application of Fox Strategic Land and Property Ltd) v Chorley BC and Preston CC and South Ribble BC
【24h】

R. (on the application of Fox Strategic Land and Property Ltd) v Chorley BC and Preston CC and South Ribble BC

机译:R.(在Fox Strategic Land and Property Ltd的申请下)诉Chorley BC,Preston CC和South Ribble BC

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Comment. This judgment concerns the first challenge to a Community Infrastructure Levy charging schedule. Paragraphs 9-32 offer a useful primer on the charge setting process. The nature of the exercise is discussed most helpfully in paras 100-107. Setting a charge is an exercise for the local authority to decide a figure within what in practice are fairly broad parameters. The examiner's responsibility is to decide whether an appropriate balance has been struck rather than to decide what figure he would have set [106]. In the maze of potential sources of information on viability and approaches to it, the Court did not find any particular decisive matter. Deciding the charging rate was therefore a matter of reaching a judgment having regard to different sources of evidence. In those circumstances there was less need to reach a firm conclusion on any particular matter. This is different to litigation-as Mr Justice Lindblom pointed out [107]-but also to many of the issues on planning appeals which can and need to be decided in a yes or no fashion.
机译:评论。该判决涉及社区基础设施征费收费计划的第一个挑战。第9-32段提供了有关费用设定程序的有用入门。第100-107段最有帮助地讨论了演习的性质。收取费用是地方当局在实际上是相当广泛的参数范围内确定数字的一种做法。审查员的责任是确定是否已经达到适当的平衡,而不是确定他应该设定的数字[106]。在关于生存能力及其解决方法的潜在信息源的迷宫中,法院没有发现任何特定的决定性问题。因此,确定收费率是要根据不同的证据来源做出判断的问题。在这种情况下,就没有必要就任何特定问题得出明确的结论。正如林德布鲁姆先生[107]指出的那样,这与诉讼不同,但也涉及计划上诉中的许多问题,这些问题可以而且需要以是或否的方式来决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号