...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pipeline engineering >Assessment of the reliability level embedded in pipeline design codes
【24h】

Assessment of the reliability level embedded in pipeline design codes

机译:评估管道设计规范中嵌入的可靠性等级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recently a prolonged discussion among specialists about the meaning of the probabilities of failure (PoF) produced by different reliability analysis methods appeared in pipeline journals. This paper, which was a long time in the making, is a follow-up on the discussion and analyses of the actual reliability level which was empirically embedded in codes for pipeline design (B31G, B31 Gmod, Shell92, and Battelle (PCORRC)) and the Russian Building Regulations(BR) for Main Pipelines , using a real pipeline as an example. The assessment of the actual reliability level empirically embedded in BR is based on assessing the order of the quintiles of strength parameters (design values of tensile strength and yield strength of the pipe material) and load (internal pressure) for the pipeline. This approach establishes a direct connection between the deterministic safety factors used in the BR and the level of reliability of the pipelines associated with these safety factors. The actual reliability level, empirically embedded in international codes, is calculated as the probability that the limit state function (LSF) of ideal pipeline (without defects) is positive: LSF = P_f - P_(op), where P_f is the failure pressure of an ideal pipe, which is estimated by the design code of interest, and P_(op) is the operating pressure. The failure and operating pressures are considered as random variables.The expression for this probability was obtained analytically and in closed form. Recommendations are also presented for choosing probability distributions and statistical parameters for random variables (RVs). Extensive calculations were undertaken to determine the reliability levels which are actually embedded in the analysed international pipeline design codes.This paper concludes that the considered international codes are very reliable, as they produce very safe designs of pipelines with very low PoF, providing a large safety margin. The algorithm presented in this paper allows for determining a relationship between the current level of pipeline degradation (in terms of PoF), with its current safety margin as a function of time. All the calculations in this paper were performed using MathCAD, and illustrations of these calculations are also presented.
机译:最近,在管道期刊中,专家们就由不同可靠性分析方法产生的故障概率(PoF)的含义进行了长时间的讨论。本文的撰写时间很长,是对实际可靠性级别的讨论和分析的后续文章,该级别以经验方式嵌入到管道设计代码(B31G,B31 Gmod,Shell92和Battelle(PCORRC))中以及以实际管道为例的《俄罗斯主要管道建筑法规》。经验性地嵌入BR中的实际可靠性级别的评估是基于评估强度参数的五分之一顺序(管道材料的抗拉强度和屈服强度的设计值)和管道的载荷(内部压力)。这种方法在BR中使用的确定性安全因素与与这些安全因素相关的管道的可靠性水平之间建立了直接的联系。根据经验嵌入在国际规范中的实际可靠性等级,计算为理想管道(无缺陷)的极限状态函数(LSF)为正的概率:LSF = P_f-P_(op),其中P_f是管道的破坏压力理想的管道,由感兴趣的设计规范估算,P_(op)是工作压力。失效和工作压力被认为是随机变量。此概率的表达式是通过解析和封闭形式获得的。还提供了有关为随机变量(RVs)选择概率分布和统计参数的建议。进行了大量的计算以确定确定的可靠性等级,这些可靠性等级实际上已嵌入分析的国际管线设计规范中。本文得出的结论是,所考虑的国际规范非常可靠,因为它们产生了非常安全的,低PoF的管线设计,提供了很大的安全性余量。本文提出的算法允许确定当前管道退化水平(以PoF表示)与其当前安全裕度随时间变化之间的关系。本文中的所有计算均使用MathCAD进行,并给出了这些计算的说明。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of pipeline engineering 》 |2016年第2期| 121-131| 共11页
  • 作者单位

    Reliability and Safety of Large Systems and Machines, Science and Engineering Centre, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia,Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia;

    Reliability and Safety of Large Systems and Machines, Science and Engineering Centre, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia,Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号