...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ornithology >Bleibt nur der Spatz in der Hand? Vögel in der Planungslandschaft 2000
【24h】

Bleibt nur der Spatz in der Hand? Vögel in der Planungslandschaft 2000

机译:手里只有麻雀吗?规划景观中的鸟类2000

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In Central Europe all the different types of landscape are more or less totally exploited or will be influenced by human impacts in near future. Short-term processes rather than long-term steady states will therefore influence bird numbers. This means a challenge for field ornithology and nature protection as well. To understand the situation of birds modern aspects of population biology and results of adequately designed monitoring should substitute or supply single counts or short-term samples. Single records or episodes on birds and their behaviour have to be interpreted more critically considering the possibilities of success (individual fitness). The situation of birds in urban environments may be described by comparing distributions and/or actual abundances, but populations have to survive sudden non predictable changes due to socio-economic purposes. Declines of House Sparrow and Crested Lark are actual examples for the problems involved. Also technogenic habitats are mostly very short-lived. Consequences of single habitat manipulations on bird populations are fare more complex than considered by most planning contributions of conservationists. An adequate network of protected areas may be the only way to conserve populations of many species.
机译:在中欧,所有不同类型的景观或多或少都已被完全开发,或在不久的将来会受到人类影响的影响。因此,短期过程而非长期稳态将影响鸟类数量。这也意味着对鸟类学和自然保护的挑战。要了解鸟类的状况,应了解种群生物学的现代方面以及经过适当设计的监测结果,应替代或提供单一计数或短期样品。考虑到成功的可能性(个体适应性),必须更严格地解释鸟类及其行为的单项记录或情节。可以通过比较分布和/或实际丰度来描述城市环境中的鸟类状况,但是由于社会经济目的,种群必须幸免于无法预料的突然变化。麻雀和凤头百灵的下降是所涉及问题的实际例子。技术性生境也很短命。单一栖息地操纵对鸟类种群造成的后果要比大多数保护主义者的规划贡献所考虑的更为复杂。适当的保护区网络可能是保护许多物种种群的唯一途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号