首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Effects of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Trial
【24h】

Effects of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Trial

机译:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者家中肺康复的效果:一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Home-based rehabilitation is a promising approach to improve access to pulmonary rehabilitation. nnObjective: To assess whether self-monitored, home-based rehabilitation is as effective as outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). nnDesign: Randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial. nnSetting: 10 academic and community medical centers in Canada. nnPatients: 252 patients with moderate to severe COPD. nnIntervention: After a 4-week education program, patients took part in home-based rehabilitation or outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation for 8 weeks. They were followed for 40 weeks to complete the 1-year study. nnMeasurements: The primary outcome was the change in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale score at 1 year. The primary analysis took a modified intention-to-treat approach by using all patients who provided data at the specified follow-up time, regardless of their level of adherence. The analysis used regression modeling that adjusted for the effects of center, sex, and baseline level. All differences were computed as home intervention minus outpatient intervention. nnResults: Both interventions produced similar improvements in the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale at 1 year: improvement in dyspnea of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.80) units in the home intervention (n = 107) and 0.46 (CI, 0.28 to 0.64) units in the outpatient intervention (n = 109). The difference between the 2 treatments at 1 year was small and clinically unimportant. The 95% CI of the difference did not exceed the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.5: difference in dyspnea score of 0.16 (CI, −0.08 to 0.40). Most adverse events were related to COPD exacerbations. No serious adverse event was considered to be related to the study intervention. nnLimitation: The contribution of the educational program to the improvement in health status and exercise tolerance cannot be ascertained. nnConclusion: Home rehabilitation is a useful, equivalent alternative to outpatient rehabilitation in patients with COPD.
机译:背景:家庭康复是一种改善肺康复的有前途的方法。 nn目的:评估在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,自我监测的家庭式康复治疗是否与门诊,医院式康复治疗一样有效。 nnDesign:随机,多中心,非劣效性试验。地点:加拿大的10个学术和社区医疗中心。 nn患者:252名中度至重度COPD患者。 nn干预:在为期4周的教育计划后,患者参加了为期8周的家庭康复或门诊,医院康复。他们进行了40周的随访,以完成为期1年的研究。 nn测量:主要结果是1年时慢性呼吸问题问卷呼吸困难量表分数的变化。通过使用在指定的随访时间提供数据的所有患者,无论他们的依从程度如何,主要分析采用了改良的“意向治疗”方法。该分析使用了回归模型,该模型针对中心,性别和基线水平的影响进行了调整。所有差异均计算为家庭干预减去门诊干预。结果:两种干预措施在1年时的慢性呼吸调查问卷呼吸困难亚评分均得到了类似的改善:家庭干预中的呼吸困难改善为0.62(95%CI,0.43至0.80)单位(n = 107)和0.46(CI,0.28至0.64) )的门诊干预单位(n = 109)。两种治疗在1年时的差异很小,在临床上并不重要。差异的95%CI未超过预先规定的非劣效性界限0.5:呼吸困难评分差异0.16(CI,-0.08至0.40)。大多数不良事件与COPD加重有关。没有严重不良事件被认为与研究干预有关。限制:无法确定教育计划对改善健康状况和运动耐量的贡献。结论:对于COPD患者,家庭康复是门诊康复的一种有用的,等效的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号