首页> 外文期刊>Journal of operations management >Safety hazard and time to recall: The role of recall strategy, product defect type,and supply chain player in the U.S. toy industry
【24h】

Safety hazard and time to recall: The role of recall strategy, product defect type,and supply chain player in the U.S. toy industry

机译:安全隐患和召回时间:召回策略,产品缺陷类型和供应链参与者在美国玩具行业中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research identifies and tests key factors that can be associated with time to recall a product. Product recalls due to safety hazards entail societal costs, such as property damage, injury, and sometimes death. For firms, the related external failure costs are many, including the costs of recalling the product, providing a remedy, meeting the legal liability, and repairing damage to the firm's reputation. The recent spate of product recalls has shifted attention from why products are recalled to why it takes so long to recall a defective product that poses a safety hazard. To address this, our research subjects to empirical scrutiny the time to recall and its relationship with recall strategies, source of the defect and supply chain position of the recalling firm. We develop and verify our conceptual arguments in the U.S. toy industry by analyzing over 500 product recalls during a 15-year period (1993-2008). The empirical results indicate that the time to recall, as measured by difference between product recall announcement date and product first sold date, is associated with (1) the recall strategy (preventive vs. reactive) adopted by the firm, (2) the type of product defect (manufacturing defect vs. design flaw), and (3) the supply chain entity that issues the recall (toy company vs. distributor vs. retailer). Our results provide cues that could trigger a firm's recognition of factors that increase the time to recall.
机译:这项研究确定并测试了与召回产品的时间有关的关键因素。由于安全隐患而导致的产品召回会产生社会成本,例如财产损失,人身伤害甚至死亡。对于公司而言,相关的外部故障成本很多,包括召回产品,提供补救,承担法律责任以及修复对公司声誉的损害的成本。最近发生的一系列产品召回已经将注意力从召回产品的原因转移到了为什么召回有安全隐患的缺陷产品需要这么长时间的原因。为了解决这个问题,我们的研究对召回时间及其与召回策略,缺陷来源和召回公司的供应链位置之间的关系进行了实证研究。我们通过分析15年内(1993-2008年)的500多次产品召回来发展和验证我们在美国玩具行业中的概念论证。实证结果表明,召回时间(通过产品召回公告日期与产品首次销售日期之间的差异来衡量)与(1)公司采用的召回策略(预防性与反应性),(2)类型有关。产品缺陷(制造缺陷与设计缺陷),以及(3)发出召回的供应链实体(玩具公司,分销商与零售商)。我们的结果提供了线索,可能会促使公司认识到增加召回时间的因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of operations management》 |2011年第8期|p.766-777|共12页
  • 作者单位

    College of Management. Georgia Institute of Technology, 800W Peachtree St. NW, Atlanta, CA 30308, United States;

    Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, 254 Drake Centre, 181 Freedman Crescent, Winnipeg, R3T 5V4, Canada;

    College of Business and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Management, Clemson University, J21B Sirrine Hall, Clemson, SC 29634-1305, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    external failure costs; safety hazard; product recalls; toy industry;

    机译:外部故障成本;安全隐患;产品召回;玩具业;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号