首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Offender Rehabilitation >Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision
【24h】

Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision

机译:探索社区监督的黑匣子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Community supervision has been an integral part of corrections since the establishment of probation more than 100 years ago. It has commonly been assumed that offenders benefit from community supervision much more than if they were incarcerated. However, empirical evidence in support of the effectiveness of community supervision in reducing recidivism questions this assumption. A detailed examination of audio taped interviews between 62 probation officers and their clients found relatively poor adherence to some of the basic principles of effective intervention-the principles of Risk, Need and Responsivity. For the most part, probation officers spent too much time on the enforcement aspect of supervision (i.e., complying with the conditions of probation) and not enough time on the service delivery role of supervision. Major criminogenic needs such as antisocial attitudes and social supports for crime were largely ignored and probation officers evidenced few of the skills (e.g., prosocial modeling, differential reinforcement) that could influence behavioral change in their clients. As a snapshot of present practices, this study begins a path to a systematic and structured training agenda to help probation officers become more effective agents of change.
机译:自从100多年缓刑成立以来,社区监督一直是惩戒工作不可或缺的一部分。通常认为,犯罪者从社区监督中受益要比监禁更多。但是,支持社区监督在减少累犯中有效性的经验证据对这一假设提出了质疑。在对62名缓刑官及其客户之间的录音采访进行的详细检查中,发现他们对有效干预的一些基本原则(风险,需求和责任感原则)的依从性相对较差。在大多数情况下,缓刑人员在监督的执行方面(即遵守缓刑条件)花了太多时间,而在监督的服务提供角色上却没有足够的时间。反社会态度和对犯罪的社会支持等主要的致犯罪需求在很大程度上被忽略,缓刑官员证明很少有会影响其客户行为改变的技能(例如,亲社会的建模,强化差异)。作为当前实践的简要介绍,这项研究为系统化和结构化的培训议程开辟了一条道路,以帮助缓刑官员成为更有效的变革推动者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号