...
首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging >An in vitro study to compare ~(99m)Xc-stannous colloids and ~(99m)Xc-HMPAO for labelling human leukocytes
【24h】

An in vitro study to compare ~(99m)Xc-stannous colloids and ~(99m)Xc-HMPAO for labelling human leukocytes

机译:体外研究比较〜(99m)Xc-胶体和〜(99m)Xc-HMPAO标记人白细胞

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aim. Aim of the present study was to compare in vitro the labelling efficiency (LE) and cell viability (TBE) of autol-ogous leukocytes labelled with ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2 and ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO, and to evaluate the quantity and quality of spontaneously released ~(99m)Tc (SR) from labelled cells at several time poults after labelling. Methods. A total of 14 patients with different diseases and 18 normal subjects were included in this study. A blood sample was collected from each patient; purified autol-ogous leukocytes were divided into 2 samples and labelled with ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2 and ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO. LE was evaluated at the end of labelling and TBE and SR were evaluated at 10 min and 1 h, 2 h and 4 h after labelling. Results. LE of ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2-WBC was higher than ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO-WBC (6l.2±18.7% and 43.3±11.3; p < 0.0001) and we found an inverse correlation between blood glucose and labelling efficiency for both methods (p=0.02). Minimal differences were also observed between 2 methods after 10 min and 1 h, as far as the cell viability is concerned. The percentage of radioactivity spontaneously released from ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2-WBC was significantly higher compared to ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO-WBC at each time point Radioactivity released from labelled cells was predominantly ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2 and ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO with few free Conclusion. Both radiopharmaceuticals are not toxic for WBC. Labelling with ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2 give a higher LE than with ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO; however, radiolabelled colloids are more released from labelled cells over a period of 4 h. While ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO is physiological excreted into gastrointestinal tract, ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2 can be re-uptaken in vivo by reticulo-endothelial cells of liver and spleen. These findings suggest that ~(99m)Tc-SnF_2-WBC might be better than ~(99m)Tc-HMPAO-WBC for studying inflammatory bowel diseases.
机译:目标。本研究的目的是在体外比较用〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2和〜(99m)Tc-HMPAO标记的自体白细胞的标记效率(LE)和细胞活力(TBE),并评估其数量标记后几个时间点从标记细胞中自发释放的〜(99m)Tc(SR)的质量和质量。方法。本研究共纳入14名不同疾病的患者和18名正常受试者。从每位患者收集血液样本;将纯化的自体白细胞分成2个样品,分别用〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2和〜(99m)Tc-HMPAO标记。在标记结束时评估LE,在标记后10分钟和1小时,2小时和4小时评估TBE和SR。结果。 〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2-WBC的LE高于〜(99m)Tc-HMPAO-WBC(6l.2±18.7%和43.3±11.3; p <0.0001),我们发现血糖与标签之间呈负相关两种方法的效率(p = 0.02)。就细胞活力而言,在10分钟和1小时后的2种方法之间也观察到了最小的差异。在每个时间点,〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2-WBC自发释放的放射性百分比显着高于〜(99m)Tc-HMPAO-WBC,从标记细胞释放的放射性主要为〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2和〜 (99m)Tc-HMPAO,几乎没有免费的结论。两种放射性药物均对WBC无毒。 〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2标记的LE比〜(99m)Tc-HMPAO标记的LE高;然而,放射性标记的胶体在4小时内会更多地从标记的细胞中释放出来。 〜(99m)Tc-HMPAO被生理排出到胃肠道,而〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2可以在体内被肝和脾的网状内皮细胞重新摄取。这些发现表明,〜(99m)Tc-SnF_2-WBC在研究炎症性肠病方面可能优于〜(99m)Tc-HMPAO-WBC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号