首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nonverbal Behavior >Judging the Credibility of Criminal Suspect Statements: Does Mode of Presentation Matter?
【24h】

Judging the Credibility of Criminal Suspect Statements: Does Mode of Presentation Matter?

机译:判断犯罪嫌疑人陈述的可信度:陈述方式是否重要?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For a study of modality differences in deception detection accuracy, groups of graduate students judged segments selected from videotapes of criminal confessions. Twenty brief utterances were presented in four ways: content only transcript, verbatim transcript, audio only, and audio/videotape. No modality difference in unbiased truth hit rate was found, but unbiased lie hit rate varied by modality, with judges of transcripts stripped of pause indications, word repeats, and umms and uhhs less accurate than verbatim transcript judges, audio judges, and audio/video judges. The 62% overall accuracy and 61% lie detection accuracy of audio judges was highest and, in contrast to other judges, audio judgments did not display a response bias. The results remain consistent with the presence of valid visual cues but suggest that at least in some situations focus on valid vocal cues may offer more accuracy.
机译:为了研究欺骗检测准确度上的形式差异,研究生群体对从犯罪自白录像带中选择的片段进行了判断。二十种简短的讲话以四种方式呈现:仅内容记录,逐字记录,仅音频和音频/录像带。没有发现无偏见真命中率的模态差异,但无偏见的谎言命中率因情态而异,成绩单的法官被剥夺了暂停指示,重复单词和umms的准确性,这比逐字记录的法官,音频法官和音频/视频的准确性低法官。音频判断者的总体准确度为62%,谎言检测准确度最高,与其他判断者相比,音频判断不显示响应偏差。结果与有效视觉提示的存在保持一致,但表明至少在某些情况下,专注于有效语音提示可能会提供更高的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号