首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurotherapy >Eyes-Closed and Activation QEEG Databases in Predicting Cognitive Effectiveness and the Inefficiency Hypothesis
【24h】

Eyes-Closed and Activation QEEG Databases in Predicting Cognitive Effectiveness and the Inefficiency Hypothesis

机译:闭眼和激活QEEG数据库预测认知效果和低效率假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background. Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) databases have been developed for the eyes closed (EC) condition. The development of a cognitive activation database is a logical and necessary development for the field. Method. Brain activation was examined by QEEG during several tasks including EC rest, visual attention (VA), auditory attention (AA), listening to paragraphs presented auditorily and reading silently. The QEEG measures obtained in the EC and simple, non-cognitive attention task that were significantly related to subsequent cognitive performance were not the same variables which accounted for success during the cognitive task. Results. There were clear differences between relative power, microvolt, coherence and phase values across these different tasks. Conclusions. The conclusions reached are (1) the associations among QEEG variables are complex and vary by task; (2) the QEEG variables which predict cognitive performance under task demands are not the same as the variables which predict to subsequent performance from the EC or simple, non-cognitive attention tasks; (3) a cognitive activation database is clinically useful; and (4) an hypothesis of brain functioning is proposed to explain the findings. The coordinated allocation of resources (CAR) hypothesis states that cognitive effectiveness is a product of multiple specific activities in the brain, which vary according to the task; and (5) the average response pattern does not involve the variables that are critical to success at the task, thus indicating an inefficiency of the normal human brain.
机译:背景。已经针对闭眼(EC)条件开发了定量脑电图(QEEG)数据库。认知激活数据库的开发是该领域合理且必要的开发。方法。 QEEG在多项任务期间检查了大脑的激活情况,包括EC休息,视觉注意(VA),听觉注意(AA),听见听觉呈现的段落和静默阅读。在EC和简单的非认知注意任务中获得的QEEG量度与随后的认知表现显着相关,这些变量不是说明认知任务成功的变量。结果。在这些不同任务之间,相对功率,微伏,相干和相位值之间存在明显差异。结论。得出的结论是:(1)QEEG变量之间的关联是复杂的,并且因任务而异; (2)预测任务要求下的认知表现的QEEG变量与预测EC或简单的非认知注意任务的后续表现的变量不同; (3)认知激活数据库在临床上是有用的; (4)提出了大脑功能的假说来解释这一发现。资源协调分配(CAR)假设指出,认知有效性是大脑中多种特定活动的产物,这些活动根据任务而有所不同; (5)平均响应模式不包含对于完成任务至关重要的变量,因此表明正常人脑效率低下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号