首页> 外文期刊>Kentucky journal of equine, agriculture, and natural resources law >In States We Trust? The Effect Of Canandyne-georgia V. Nationsbank, N.a. (south) On Liabilityrnunder The Cercla Superfund
【24h】

In States We Trust? The Effect Of Canandyne-georgia V. Nationsbank, N.a. (south) On Liabilityrnunder The Cercla Superfund

机译:在我们信任的国家? Canandyne-Georgia V.Nationalbank,N.a.的影响(南)The Cercla Superfund项下的责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is clear that Congress either needs to remedy the situation through a legislative amendment, or courts must come to an agreement as to what the proper standard of "ownership" should be under CERCLA. The use of differing standards in Canandyne and Garbage Services creates uncertainty that the market for trusteeships cannot accurately account for. The easiest way for Congress to remedy this problem is to write a definitional standard of ownership into the statute. However, a more comprehensive solution might be to add provisions that touch specifically upon how trusts should be treated in the context of CERCLA. This would allow for a more detail, but would be more legislatively complex and would, ultimately, divest power from the courts in making the final decision. Either option is viable and should be examined thoroughly in the near future. Without a change, there is simply too much uncertainty for efficient management of trusts and other estate planning devises.
机译:显然,国会要么需要通过立法修正案来纠正这种情况,要么法院必须就CERCLA规定的“所有权”的适当标准达成一致。 Canandyne and Garbage Services中使用不同的标准会产生不确定性,即托管市场无法准确解释。国会解决此问题的最简单方法是将所有权的定义标准写入法规。但是,更全面的解决方案可能是添加一些条款,这些条款专门涉及在CERCLA上下文中应如何对待信任。这样可以提供更多细节,但是在立法上会更加复杂,并且最终会在做出最终裁决时剥夺法院的权力。两种选择都是可行的,应在不久的将来进行彻底检查。如果不进行更改,则对信托和其他遗产规划设计的有效管理存在太多不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号