首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multinational Financial Management >Bad luck, Bad policy or Bad banking? Understanding the financial management behavior of MENA banks
【24h】

Bad luck, Bad policy or Bad banking? Understanding the financial management behavior of MENA banks

机译:运气不好,政策不好还是银行业务不好?了解中东和北非银行的财务管理行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The importance of management behaviour for MENA country banks has gained significant importance, especially in the wake of the financial crisis. To address this issue, we exploit bank-level data across MENA countries for an extended time period and examine the different facets of management behaviur. The analysis provides evidence in favor of bad luck hypothesis that is equally applicable to both conventional and Islamic banks. Relatedly, we also find that the moral hazard hypothesis and the gamble for resurrection hypothesis to be relevant, although the relative importance of the management behavior differs across bank ownership. Further disaggregation by country categorizations shows that this behavior varies between oil exporters and oil importers as also between countries with explicit and implicit deposit insurance. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:管理行为对中东和北非国家银行的重要性已变得越来越重要,尤其是在金融危机之后。为了解决此问题,我们在较长的时间内利用了中东和北非国家的银行级数据,并研究了管理行为的不同方面。该分析提供了支持运气假说的证据,该假说同样适用于传统银行和伊斯兰银行。与此相关的是,尽管管理行为的相对重要性因银行所有权而异,但我们也发现道德风险假说和复活假说是相关的。按国家分类进一步分类显示,这种行为在石油出口商和石油进口商之间以及在具有显性和隐性存款保险的国家之间都不同。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号