首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Moral Education >Taking development seriously: critique of the 2008 JME Special Issue on moral functioning
【24h】

Taking development seriously: critique of the 2008 JME Special Issue on moral functioning

机译:认真对待发展:对2008年JME道德运作专刊的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This essay comments on articles comprising a Journal of Moral Education Special Issue (September, 2008, 37[3]). The issue was intended to honour the 50th anniversary of Lawrence Kohlberg's doctoral dissertation and his subsequent impact on the field of moral development and education. The articles were characterised by the Issue editor (Don Collins Reed) as providing a 'look forward' from Kohlberg's work toward a more comprehensive or integrated model of moral functioning. Prominent were culturally pluralist and biologically-based themes, such as cultural learning; expert skill; culturally shaped and neurobiologically-based predispositions or intuitions; and moral self-relevance or centrality. Inadequately represented, however, was Kohlberg's (and Piaget's) key concept of development as the construction of a deeper or more adequate understanding not reducible to particular socialisation practices or cultural contexts. Also neglected were related cognitive-developmental themes, along with supportive evidence. Robert Coles' account of a sudden rescue is used as a heuristic to depict Piaget's/Kohlberg's approach to the development of moral functioning. We conclude that, insofar as the Special Issue does not take development seriously, it moves us not forward but, instead, back to the problems of moral relativism and moral paralysis that Kohlberg sought to redress from the start of his work more than 50 years ago.
机译:本文对包括《德育杂志》特刊(2008年9月,第37 [3]页)的文章发表评论。该刊旨在纪念劳伦斯·科尔伯格(Lawrence Kohlberg)博士论文发表50周年及其对道德发展和教育领域的影响。文章的编辑以《问题》编辑(唐·柯林斯·里德(Don Collins Reed))为特征,为科尔伯格的工作提供了一种“前瞻性”观点,以寻求更全面或整合的道德运作模式。突出的是文化多元化和基于生物学的主题,例如文化学习。专业技能;基于文化和神经生物学的倾向或直觉;和道德的自我相关性或中心性。但是,科尔伯格(和伯爵)的关键发展概念没有得到足够的体现,因为它们无法形成对特定社会化实践或文化背景的更深层或更充分的理解。也忽略了相关的认知发展主题以及支持性证据。罗伯特·科尔斯(Robert Coles)对突然救助的描述被用作启发式方法,描绘了伯爵(Piaget)/科尔伯格(Kohlberg)对道德功能发展的态度。我们得出的结论是,就特刊没有认真对待发展而言,它使我们没有前进,反而回到了科尔伯格从其工作开始50年前就试图解决的道德相对主义和道德瘫痪问题。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号