首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Moral Education >The paradox of meaning well while causing harm: a discussion about the limits of tolerance within democratic societies
【24h】

The paradox of meaning well while causing harm: a discussion about the limits of tolerance within democratic societies

机译:在造成伤害的同时很好理解的悖论:关于民主社会中容忍的局限性的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Curriculum guidelines in many democratic countries argue for the need to practice tolerance as a means to creating peaceful relations. Through moral education, young people are believed to be able to develop a way of being that respects plurality and decreases interpersonal violence in society. But where do students’ personal involvements or the issue of unpredictability accompanying inter-personal relations fit into the discussion? This article draws on four young people’s narratives as starting points to discuss the gap between progressive educational ideals and embodied ideals when it comes to stimulating peaceful relationships. The study indicates that these youths see themselves as persons who do not want to expose others to strong emotions (similar to the educational ideals of being tolerant), while at the same time struggling with strong emotions that tend to hurt themselves and/or others and paralyse their ability to actively interfere when people are being hurt. In order to understand these findings, Julia Kristeva’s notion of ego ideal and the abject are used as analytical tools. Her reasoning contributes to understanding inconsistencies in (young) people’s responses to others as significant to acknowledge when it comes to opposing oppression—inconsistencies which otherwise tend to be treated as temporal setbacks in the progression toward human perfection.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2012.677609
机译:许多民主国家的课程指南都主张有必要实行宽容,以建立和平关系。通过道德教育,人们相信年轻人能够发展一种尊重多元化并减少社会人际暴力的生活方式。但是,学生的个人参与或伴随人际关系的不可预测性问题在哪里适合讨论呢?本文以四个年轻人的叙述为起点,讨论了在促进和平关系方面进步的教育理想与具体理想之间的差距。该研究表明,这些年轻人将自己视为不想让他人暴露于强烈情绪中的人(类似于宽容的教育理想),而与此同时却在挣扎着倾向于伤害自己和/或他人的强烈情绪中挣扎,使人们在受到伤害时主动干预的能力瘫痪。为了理解这些发现,朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃的自我理想概念和目标被用作分析工具。她的推理有助于理解(年轻人)人们对他人的回应中的矛盾之处,这对于承认反对压迫非常重要,因为矛盾之处在人们追求完美的过程中往往被视为暂时的挫折。查看全文下载全文textRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2012.677609

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号