首页> 外文期刊>Journal of money, credit and banking >Capital Subsidies versus Labor Subsidies: A Trade-off between Capital and Employment?
【24h】

Capital Subsidies versus Labor Subsidies: A Trade-off between Capital and Employment?

机译:资本补贴与劳动力补贴:资本与就业之间的权衡?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the effects of factor subsidies on capital formation and employment in an OLG small open economy model of wealth accumulation. Two cases are explored, one with neoclassical wages and one with incentive-wages. We show that in the neoclassical model a capital subsidy spurs capital and causes a temporary increase in manhours which vanishes in the long-run, while a labor subsidy may temporarily increase inputs, but is neutral for steady state capital and labor. In the incentive-wage economy, a capital subsidy boosts investment and aggravates unemployment, while a labor subsidy stimulates employment and will in some conditions depress capital formation.
机译:本文在OLG小规模开放经济的财富积累模型中考察了要素补贴对资本形成和就业的影响。探索了两种情况,一种是新古典主义的工资,另一种是激励性工资。我们表明,在新古典模型中,资本补贴刺激了资本并导致工时的暂时增加,从长期来看,这种劳动消失了,而劳动力补贴可能会暂时增加投入,但对于稳定状态的资本和劳动力却是中立的。在激励性工资经济中,资本补贴可以促进投资并加剧失业,而劳动力补贴可以刺激就业,并且在某些情况下会抑制资本形成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号