...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Monetary Economics >Discussion of Acharya and Skeie: A model of liquidity hoarding and term premia in inter-bank markets
【24h】

Discussion of Acharya and Skeie: A model of liquidity hoarding and term premia in inter-bank markets

机译:关于Acharya和Skeie的讨论:银行间市场流动性ity积和长期溢价的模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the last 3 years, we have seen a flurry of research papers documenting and trying to explain events in the interbank market during the crisis of 2007-2009. On August 9th, 2007 something striking happened with the pricing of interbank term loans (most noteworthy at the 1 and 3-month maturities): the interest rate charged for those loans "jumped" abruptly. A common representation of this phenomenon is the plot of the time series for the Libor-OIS spread, as presented in Fig. 1 of Acharya and Skeie's paper. The price of term loans remained high (and volatile) after the initial jump and, in September 2008, it jumped again to truly extreme levels. The volatility of interest rates in the US overnight interbank market also increased significantly during the period and there were numerous reports at the time that the market was working under extreme strain. One possible explanation for these events is that counterparty credit risk increased significantly for a subset of the participants in this market, and hence, the observed interest rates reflected a higher risk premium (Taylor and Williams, 2009). Transactions in the interbank market for loans are conducted over-the-counter and the reported interest rate is an average of a sample of relevant quotes for a given period of time. If some of the transactions involve borrowers with a significant credit risk, then the higher interest rates charged in those transactions will tend to increase the average. Under this view, the term interbank market for loans functioned fairly well during the crisis, correctly pricing the repayment risk associated with realized transactions at each time.
机译:在过去的三年中,我们看到了一系列研究论文,这些论文记录并试图解释2007-2009年危机期间银行间市场的事件。 2007年8月9日,银行间定期贷款的定价发生了惊人的变化(在1个月和3个月到期时最值得注意):对这些贷款收取的利率突然“跳跃”了起来。这种现象的常见代表是Libor-OIS传播的时间序列图,如Acharya和Skeie的论文的图1所示。在最初上涨之后,定期贷款的价格仍然很高(且波动较大),在2008年9月,价格又再次跃升至真正的极端水平。在此期间,美国隔夜银行间市场利率的波动性也显着增加,当时有大量报道称市场处于极端压力之下。这些事件的一种可能解释是,该市场中部分参与者的交易对手信用风险显着增加,因此,观察到的利率反映出较高的风险溢价(Taylor and Williams,2009)。银行间市场贷款交易是在场外进行的,报告的利率是给定时间段内相关报价样本的平均值。如果某些交易涉及具有重大信用风险的借款人,则这些交易收取的较高利率将倾向于提高平均利率。根据这种观点,在危机期间,术语“银行同业拆借市场”运作良好,每次都正确定价了与已实现交易相关的还款风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Monetary Economics》 |2011年第5期|p.448-452|共5页
  • 作者

    Huberto M. Ennis;

  • 作者单位

    Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, VA 23219, United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号