...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of microanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS >Comparison between e-beam direct write and immersion lithography for 20-nm node
【24h】

Comparison between e-beam direct write and immersion lithography for 20-nm node

机译:20纳米节点电子束直接写入和浸没式光刻的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

E-beam direct write (EBDW) process window (PW) simulations were performed on critical layers in Altera designs of the 20-nm node (minimum metal half-pitch 32 nm). For selected layout clips, a direct comparison is made with 193i simulation results. Local interconnect and ViaO (single patterning) and Metal 1 (litho-etch-litho-etch double patterning) layers are considered. The EBDW dose latitude was found to exceed that of the 193i process by a factor of 4. As the electron beam total spot size is of the order of the critical dimension for the considered node, interplay between neighboring features is low. This results in straightforward data preparation with typically two kernels and "clean" PWs. The latter are mainly limited by edge placement errors of line ends. The curves for the various simulation sites roughly overlap, as opposed to the 193i case in which they significantly differ. In EBDW, the performance of square vias equals that of rectangular vias, enabling a denser via packing.
机译:在20纳米节点(最小金属半间距32纳米)的Altera设计中,对关键层执行了电子束直接写入(EBDW)工艺窗口(PW)仿真。对于选定的布局片段,将直接与193i仿真结果进行比较。考虑了局部互连,ViaO(单图案)和金属1(平版印刷-平版印刷双图案)层。发现EBDW的剂量范围比193i过程的范围大4倍。由于电子束的总光斑尺寸约为所考虑节点的临界尺寸,因此相邻特征之间的相互作用较低。这通常使用两个内核和“干净的” PW进行简单的数据准备。后者主要受线端边缘放置误差的限制。与193i情况显着不同的情况相比,各个模拟位置的曲线大致重叠。在EBDW中,方形通孔的性能等于矩形通孔的性能,从而可以实现更密集的通孔填充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号