首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medicine and Philosophy >Between Technocracy and Democratic Legitimation: A Proposed Compromise Position for Common Morality Public Bioethics
【24h】

Between Technocracy and Democratic Legitimation: A Proposed Compromise Position for Common Morality Public Bioethics

机译:在技​​术官僚主义与民主合法性之间:共同道德公共生物伦理学的拟议妥协立场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article I explore the underlying political philosophy of public bioethics by comparing it to technocratic authority, particularly the technocratic authority claimed by economists in Mexico in the 1980s and 1990s. I find that public bioethics—at least in the dominant forms—is implicitly designed for and tries to use technocratic authority. I examine how this type of bioethics emerged and has continued. I finish by arguing that, as claims to technocratic authority go, bioethics is in an incredibly weak position, which partly explains why it has never gained the degree of public legitimacy that other technocracies have gained. I conclude by arguing for a “technocracy-lite” orientation for public bioethics.
机译:在本文中,我通过将其与技术专家制权威(尤其是1980年代和1990年代墨西哥经济学家宣称的技术专家制权威)进行比较,探索了公共生物伦理学的基本政治哲学。我发现,至少以主导形式存在的公共生物伦理学是隐性地设计用于并试图利用技术官僚权威的。我研究了这种生物伦理学是如何出现并持续的。最后,我要论证的是,随着对技术专家制权威的宣称不断发展,生物伦理学处于极其薄弱的地位,这在一定程度上解释了为什么它从未获得其他技术专家制所具有的公共合法性。最后,我为公众生物伦理学主张“轻薄技术主义”取向。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Medicine and Philosophy》 |2006年第3期|213-234|共22页
  • 作者

    John H. Evans;

  • 作者单位

    University of California at San Diego La Jolla California USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号