...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Toxicology >A modified goldfrank sniffing bar improves accuracy in identifying simulated toxins in a case-based teaching model
【24h】

A modified goldfrank sniffing bar improves accuracy in identifying simulated toxins in a case-based teaching model

机译:改进的Goldfrank嗅探条可提高基于案例的教学模型中识别模拟毒素的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To determine if olfactory analysis of toxin proxies aid in the identification of poisons when compared to case histories alone. Methods: A convenience sample of 42 emergency medicine residents participated in a prospective single-blind observational study using a sniffing bar designed with the technique described by Goldfrank et.al. Each subject received 12 written cases describing a patient with a chemical exposure. Ten chemicals with odors corresponding to a specific case history and 2 chemical case controls with no odor comprised the sniffing bar. Each subject was asked to identify the toxin first by reading the case history alone, then again after smelling the corresponding odor. All subjects were asked to record their level of confidence for each case before and after the addition of the sniffing bar using a 5-point Likert scale. Percentages correct before and after the sniffing bar intervention were calculated and two-tailed p-values and 95% confidence intervals were measured. Continuous comparative variables such as the means of the Likert scale confidence measurements were analyzed with the two-tailedt-test. Results: Median percentage of toxins correctly identified was 64.3% (range 9.5–97.6) when based on case description alone and 86.9% (range 9.5–95.2) with addition of the sniffing bar. The percentage of initially incorrect identification reversed after additional data provided by the sniffing bar was 11.5% (range 0–14). Of the 10 actual toxins, correct identification of 6 achieved statistical significance after introduction of the sniffing bar (p = 0.0017; 95% CI 4.6–11.4). There was no association between level of training and improved accuracy with use of the sniffing bar, and overall confidence did not improve significantly after addition of the sniffing bar. Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy of poisons in case-based scenarios is improved with the use of a sniffing bar. The sniffing bar is a useful adjunct to a traditional case-based emergency medicine toxicology teaching curriculum.
机译:与单独的病历相比,确定毒素代理的嗅觉分析是否有助于鉴定毒物。方法:42名急诊医学住院患者的便利样本参加了一项前瞻性单盲观察性研究,该研究使用的吸气棒采用Goldfrank等人描述的技术设计。每个受试者都收到12个书面案例,描述了一个有化学暴露的患者。嗅探条包括十种具有对应于特定案例历史的气味的化学物质和2种无气味的化学物质对照。首先要求每个受试者仅通过阅读病史来识别毒素,然后在闻到相应的气味后再次识别毒素。要求所有受试者使用5点Likert量表在添加嗅探棒之前和之后记录他们对每种情况的置信度。计算在嗅探棒干预之前和之后的正确百分比,并测量两尾p值和95%置信区间。连续比较变量(如李克特量表置信度测量的均值)通过两尾检验进行了分析。结果:仅根据病例描述,正确识别出的毒素中位百分比为64.3%(范围9.5–97.6),加上嗅探条则为86.9%(范围9.5–95.2)。在由嗅探条提供的其他数据后,最初不正确的标识所占的百分比为11.5%(范围为0-14)。在吸入的10种实际毒素中,正确识别出6种具有统计学意义(p = 0.0017; 95%CI 4.6–11.4)。在使用嗅探棒的情况下,训练水平与提高的准确性之间没有关联,并且在添加嗅探棒之后,总体置信度并未显着提高。结论:通过使用嗅探条,可以提高在基于案例的情况下毒物的诊断准确性。嗅探条是传统的基于案例的急诊药物毒理学教学课程的有用辅助。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Medical Toxicology》 |2008年第1期|11-15|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Emergency Medicine Albert Einstein Medical Center 5501 Old York Road 19141 Philadelphia PA;

    Department of Emergency Medicine Albert Einstein Medical Center 5501 Old York Road 19141 Philadelphia PA;

    Department of Emergency Medicine Albert Einstein Medical Center 5501 Old York Road 19141 Philadelphia PA;

    Department of Emergency Medicine Albert Einstein Medical Center 5501 Old York Road 19141 Philadelphia PA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    odor recognition; poisoning; toxicology; teaching;

    机译:气味识别;中毒;毒理学;教学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号