...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of materials science >Effects Of Different Preparation Procedures During Tooth Whitening On Enamel Bonding
【24h】

Effects Of Different Preparation Procedures During Tooth Whitening On Enamel Bonding

机译:牙齿增白过程中不同制备方法对牙釉质粘结的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this study was to assess effects of some clinically related preparation procedures during tooth whitening on enamel bonding properties. Sixty-two extracted human teeth were cleaned and divided into four groups. Forty-two of the teeth were left with their natural surface intact while 20 teeth were polished to form a flat surface. Half of the tooth served as the experimental side and received one of the two whitening products: Opales-cence (10% carbamide peroxide) and Crest Whitestrips (6.5% hydrogen peroxide), for 2 weeks. Post-bleaching intervals included: 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks. On these days, tooth (10 mm × 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm) sections were evaluated using Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and tensile bond strength tests. T-test, ANOVA test, and mixed model regression analysis were used to assess the differences. No significant difference existed between natural surface and polished surface teeth for all groups at both Day One and Week Two (P > 0.05). On Day One, both treated groups had significant lower bond strength than the control group (P = 0.002). After 2 weeks, no significant difference existed between any group (P = 0.381). SEM indicated that resin-enamel interfaces in bleached enamel exhibited more defects in granular formations when compared to the control. Raman results indicated a lower degree of polymerization (DP) of adhesive at the interface for treated teeth surfaces. In summary, pre-bleaching surface treatments such as polish or non-polish, had no effect on bond strength. Bleaching significantly decreased bond strength initially, but after 2 weeks, bleaching had no significant effect on bond strength. Storage time had significant effect on Opales-cence treated enamel, but not on control and Whitestrip treated enamel. The decrease of bond strength may be related to interfacial defects and low DP due to oxygen release after bleaching.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估牙齿增白过程中一些与临床相关的准备程序对牙釉质粘结特性的影响。清洁了62个拔出的人类牙齿,并将其分为四组。剩下的42颗牙齿的自然表面完好无损,而将20颗牙齿抛光以形成平坦的表面。牙齿的一半用作实验面,并接受两种美白产品之一:Opal​​es-cence(10%过氧化脲)和Crest Whitestrips(6.5%过氧化氢),持续2周。漂白后的间隔包括:1天,1周和2周。这几天,使用拉曼光谱,扫描电子显微镜和拉伸强度测试对牙齿(10 mm×1.5 mm×1.5 mm)截面进行了评估。使用T检验,ANOVA检验和混合模型回归分析来评估差异。在第一天和第二周,所有组的自然表面和抛光表面牙齿之间都没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。在第一天,两个治疗组的粘合强度均显着低于对照组(P = 0.002)。 2周后,任何一组之间均无显着性差异(P = 0.381)。扫描电镜表明,与对照相比,漂白搪瓷中的树脂-搪瓷界面在颗粒形成中表现出更多的缺陷。拉曼结果表明,在已处理牙齿表面的界面处,粘合剂的聚合度(DP)较低。总之,预抛光的表面处理(如抛光或非抛光)对粘合强度没有影响。起初漂白显着降低了粘结强度,但是在2周后,漂白对粘结强度没有显着影响。储存时间对经Opales-cence处理的瓷釉有显着影响,但对对照和Whitestrip处理的瓷釉没有显着影响。粘结强度的降低可能与界面缺陷和由于漂白后释放的氧气导致的DP低有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号