...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of materials science >Comparison of the performance of natural latex membranes prepared with different procedures and PTFE membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in rabbits
【24h】

Comparison of the performance of natural latex membranes prepared with different procedures and PTFE membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in rabbits

机译:不同方法制备的天然乳胶膜和PTFE膜在兔引导骨再生(GBR)中的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work assessed the performance of membranes made of natural latex extracted from Hevea brasili-ensis prepared with three different methods: polymerized immediately after collection without the use of ammonia (L1); polymerized after preservation in ammonia solution (L2); and polymerized after storage in ammonia, followed by Soxhlet technique for the extraction of substances (L3). Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane was used as control. Two 10-mm diameter bone defects were surgically made in the calvaria of thirty adult male New Zealand rabbits. Defects (total n = 60) were treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using L1, L2, L3 or PTFE membranes (n = 15 for each membrane). Ten animals were euthanized after 7, 20 and 60 days postoperatively so that five samples (n = 5) of each treatment were collected at each time, and bone regeneration was assessed microscopically. The microscopic analysis revealed defects filled with blood clot and new bone formation at the margins of the defect in all 7-day samples, while 20-day defects were mainly filled with fibrous connective tissue. After 60 days defects covered with L1 membranes showed a significantly larger bone formation area in comparison to the other groups (P < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey). Additionally, bone tissue hypersensitization for L1 and PTFE membranes was also investigated in six additional rabbits. The animals were subjected to the same surgical procedure for the confection of one 10-mm diameter bone defect that was treated with L1 (n = 3) or PTFE (n = 3). Fifty-three days later, a second surgery was performed to make a second defect, which was treated with the same type of membrane used in the first surgery. Seven days later, the animals were euthanized and samples analyzed. No differences among L1 and PTFE samples collected from sensitized and non-sensitized animals were found (P > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis). Therefore, the results demonstrated that latex membranes presented performance comparable to PTFE membranes, and that L1 membranes induced higher bone formation. L1 and PTFE membranes produced no hypersensitization in the bone tissue.
机译:这项工作评估了用三种不同方法制备的从巴西橡胶树提取的天然胶乳制成的膜的性能:收集后立即聚合而不使用氨(L1);在氨溶液(L2)中保存后发生聚合;并在氨气中储存后聚合,然后用索氏萃取技术提取物质(L3)。聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)膜用作对照。在三十只成年雄性新西兰兔的颅骨中通过手术制造了两个直径为10毫米的骨缺损。使用L1,L2,L3或PTFE膜(每个膜n = 15)通过引导骨再生(GBR)处理缺陷(总计n = 60)。术后7、20和60天对10只动物实施安乐死,以便每次收集每种治疗的5个样品(n = 5),并在显微镜下评估骨的再生。显微镜分析显示,在所有7天的样本中,缺损处充满了血块和新的骨形成,而20天的缺损主要是由纤维结缔组织填充的。 60天后,与其他组相比,被L1膜覆盖的缺损显示出明显更大的骨形成面积(P <0.05,ANOVA,Tukey)。此外,还在另外六只兔子中研究了L1和PTFE膜的骨组织超敏反应。对动物进行相同的手术治疗,以治疗一个直径10毫米的骨缺损,并用L1(n = 3)或PTFE(n = 3)处理。 53天后,进行了第二次手术以制造第二个缺陷,并用与第一次手术中使用的相同类型的膜进行治疗。七天后,对动物实施安乐死并分析样品。从致敏动物和非致敏动物采集的L1和PTFE样品之间没有差异(P> 0.05,Kruskal-Wallis)。因此,结果表明,乳胶膜的性能可与PTFE膜媲美,而L1膜可诱导更高的骨形成。 L1和PTFE膜未在骨组织中产生超敏反应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of materials science》 |2014年第9期|2111-2120|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Universidade Sagrado Coracao, Rua Irma Arminda 10-50, Bauru, SP 17.011-160, Brazil;

    Faculdade de Ciencias, UNESP, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Bauru 17033-360, SP, Brazil;

    Universidade Sagrado Coracao, Rua Irma Arminda 10-50, Bauru, SP 17.011-160, Brazil;

    Universidade Sagrado Coracao, Rua Irma Arminda 10-50, Bauru, SP 17.011-160, Brazil;

    Faculdade de Ciencias, UNESP, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Bauru 17033-360, SP, Brazil;

    Universidade Sagrado Coracao, Rua Irma Arminda 10-50, Bauru, SP 17.011-160, Brazil;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号