首页> 外文期刊>Journal of materials in civil engineering >Comparison of Laboratory and Field Asphalt Aging for Polymer-Modified and Warm-Mix Asphalt Binders
【24h】

Comparison of Laboratory and Field Asphalt Aging for Polymer-Modified and Warm-Mix Asphalt Binders

机译:聚合物改性和温拌沥青粘合剂的实验室和现场沥青老化的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The laboratory aging tests for binders were developed based on Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) tests in the 1990s (i.e.,performance grading); the applicability of performance grade (PG) to recently developed tests, such as multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR), is not clear. In addition, the ability of laboratory aging to represent field pavement aging, especially when polymer-modified asphalt (PMA) and warm-mix asphalt (WMA) binders are used, has been a concern to paving practice. This paper investigates quantitatively the level of laboratory aging compared to the field aging for both the control hot-mix asphalt (HMA) binders and WMA and PMA binders. The study focuses on a number of binder parameters, as well as evaluating whether the current laboratory aging conditions (loose-mix oven aging) will provide correlation to field short-term aging. HMA and WMA binders from four field projects that covered different climatic zones, pavement structures, and materials were selected. Binder properties including high-temperature PG, MSCR nonrecoverable creep compliance, low-temperature binder PG, and fracture energy were used for analysis. The results show that the laboratory rolling thin-film oven (RTFO) aging method is not sufficient to simulate field short-term aging conditions for most cases except for the low-temperature PG test. The aging of asphalt binder is parameter sensitive; depending on the parameters used, the comparison results between laboratory aging and field aging could be different. The effect of aging on PMA binder, especially when mixed with Sasobit additive, differs from non-polymer-modified binders. Limited results from non-polymer-modified binder mixes suggested that loose-mix oven aging at 85 degrees C for 2, 5, and 7days appears to provide a reasonable simulation of field pavement aging right after compaction (0years), 1.8years, and 3years. (c) 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:粘合剂的实验室老化测试是根据1990年代战略公路研究计划(SHRP)测试(即性能等级)开发的;性能等级(PG)对最近开发的测试(例如多重应力蠕变恢复(MSCR))的适用性尚不清楚。此外,实验室老化代表现场路面老化的能力,尤其是在使用聚合物改性沥青(PMA)和热拌沥青(WMA)粘结剂时,已成为铺路实践的关注点。本文对比了对照热混合沥青(HMA)粘合剂和WMA和PMA粘合剂的实验室老化水平与现场老化之间的关系。该研究着重于许多粘合剂参数,以及评估当前的实验室老化条件(松散混合炉老化)是否将与田间短期老化相关。从覆盖不同气候区域,路面结构和材料的四个现场项目中选择了HMA和WMA粘合剂。分析了包括高温PG,MSCR不可恢复的蠕变柔量,低温粘合剂PG和断裂能在内的粘合剂性能。结果表明,除了低温PG测试外,大多数情况下,实验室滚动薄膜烘箱(RTFO)老化方法不足以模拟现场短期老化条件。沥青粘合剂的老化对参数敏感;根据使用的参数,实验室老化和现场老化之间的比较结果可能会有所不同。老化对PMA粘合剂的影响,特别是与Sasobit添加剂混合时,与非聚合物改性的粘合剂不同。非聚合物改性的粘结剂混合物的有限结果表明,在85摄氏度下进行2天,5天和7天的松散混合炉老化似乎可以对压实(0年),1.8年和3年后的路面摊铺老化提供合理的模拟。 。 (c)2018年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号