首页> 外文期刊>Journal of materials in civil engineering >Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete
【24h】

Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete

机译:活性粉末混凝土抗拉强度的质量评估试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100MPa at the age of 28days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.
机译:这项研究对确定活性粉末混凝土(RPC)拉伸强度的不同测试程序之间进行了比较。拉伸强度测试方法包括直接拉伸测试和两个间接拉伸测试,即劈裂测试和双冲头测试(DPT)。在这项研究中,RPC被设计为在28天时获得100MPa的名义抗压强度。宏钢纤维用于通过体积百分比0、1、2和3%来增强RPC。 RPC的机械性能在28天时获得,例如抗压强度,抗张强度和抗弯强度。压应力-应变关系;和拉伸应力-应变行为。通过将两个间接拉伸试验的实验结果与单轴直接拉伸试验(DTT)进行比较,表明DPT所提供的RPC拉伸强度的结果要比劈裂试验更准确。用现有模型验证了实验结果,以预测RPC的拉伸强度。此外,考虑到低成本和DPT的易操作性,该测试可以用作DTT的替代品以获得RPC的拉伸强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号