...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Managemen >Waste management of electric and electronic equipment: comparative analysis of end-of-life strategies
【24h】

Waste management of electric and electronic equipment: comparative analysis of end-of-life strategies

机译:电气和电子设备的废物管理:报废策略的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article analyzes diverse aspects of the waste management of electronic and electric equipment. The scope of the study focuses on end-of-life strategies currently implemented in industrialized economies such as Japan, the United States, and the European Union. The objective is a comparative analysis of such strategies in order to identify logistic issues that may contribute to the further improvement of waste management policies. The results indicate that although all strategies follow the extended producer responsibility principle, in practice several logistic differences arise due to particular interpretations of the concept. In general, it was observed that a direct comparison is rather difficult since the strategies consider different legal frameworks, they cover different types and numbers of products, and the resultant mass flows and related operational costs are highly context-dependent variables. Therefore, it is not possible to indicate which strategy presents the highest overall efficiency. The study concludes that a little contribution is feasible if the advantages and weaknesses of the models depicted and discussed here are considered in further regulatory decisions.
机译:本文分析了电子和电气设备废物管理的各个方面。研究范围集中在日本,美国和欧盟等工业化经济体当前实施的报废策略。目的是对此类策略进行比较分析,以识别可能有助于进一步改善废物管理政策的物流问题。结果表明,尽管所有策略都遵循扩展的生产者责任原则,但由于对该概念的特殊解释,在实践中仍存在一些逻辑上的差异。总的来说,由于战略考虑了不同的法律框架,涵盖了不同类型和数量的产品,并且由此产生的质量流量和相关的运营成本是高度依赖于上下文的变量,因此直接比较非常困难。因此,不可能指出哪种策略具有最高的总体效率。研究得出的结论是,如果在进一步的监管决策中考虑此处描述和讨论的模型的优点和缺点,则可以做出一点贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号