首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality >Ethical Responsibilities to Subjects and Documentary Filmmaking
【24h】

Ethical Responsibilities to Subjects and Documentary Filmmaking

机译:对主题和纪录片摄制的道德责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Documentary filmmakers have ethical responsibilities to the subjects of their films. Specifically, they have an ethical responsibility to prevent harm to their subjects if they are in a position to do so, even harm not directly related to being in the film. Justification for this comes from documentary's status as a practice of a social institution and can be supported by Utilitarian and Kantian considerations, as well as the Aristotelian discussion of practices. Three films, The Thin Blue Line, Dope Sick Love, and Born Into Brothels, are used as examples for the requirement to prevent harm to subjects. These examples cover several different possibilities of how documentary filmmakers behave concerning the welfare of their subjects and are evaluated in light of ethical considerations offered.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2010.497025
机译:纪实电影制片人对其电影主题负有道德责任。具体而言,如果他们有能力这样做,他们有道德责任防止伤害对象,甚至与影片中没有直接伤害的伤害。证明这一点的理由来自纪录片作为一种社会制度的实践的地位,可以得到功利主义和康德主义的考虑,以及亚里士多德对实践的讨论的支持。为了防止伤害对象,使用了三部电影《瘦蓝线》,《兴奋的爱》和《生于妓院》。这些示例涵盖了纪实电影制片人关于其主题福利的行为的几种不同可能性,并根据提供的道德考量进行了评估。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike, netvibes,推特,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2010.497025

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号