...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Marketing >Why Do Firms Invest in Consumer Advertising with Limited Sales Response? A Shareholder Perspective
【24h】

Why Do Firms Invest in Consumer Advertising with Limited Sales Response? A Shareholder Perspective

机译:为什么企业在销售响应有限的情况下投资于消费者广告?股东观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Marketing managers increasingly recognize the need to measure and communicate the impact of their actions on shareholder returns. This study focuses on the shareholder value effects of pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) and direct-to-physician (DTP) marketing efforts. Although DTCA has moderate effects on brand sales and market share, companies invest vast amounts of money in it. Relying on Kalman filtering, the authors develop a methodology to assess the effects from DTCA and DTP on three components of shareholder value: stock return, systematic risk, and idiosyncratic risk. Investors value DTCA positively because it leads to higher stock returns and lower systematic risk. Furthermore, DTCA increases idiosyncratic risk, which does not affect investors who maintain well-diversified portfolios. In contrast, DTP marketing has modest positive effects on stock returns and idiosyncratic risk. The outcomes indicate that evaluations of marketing expenditures should include a consideration of the effects of marketing on multiple stakeholders, not just the sales effects on consumers.
机译:营销经理越来越认识到需要衡量和传达其行为对股东回报的影响。这项研究的重点是药品直接面向消费者的广告(DTCA)和直接面向医师(DTP)的营销活动对股东价值的影响。尽管DTCA对品牌销售和市场份额有中等影响,但是公司在其中投入了大量资金。依靠卡尔曼滤波,作者开发了一种方法来评估DTCA和DTP对股东价值的三个组成部分的影响:股票收益,系统风险和特质风险。投资者对DTCA给予正面评价是因为它会导致更高的股票回报率和更低的系统风险。此外,DTCA增加了特质风险,这不会影响维持良好投资组合的投资者。相反,DTP营销对股票收益和特质风险有适度的积极影响。结果表明,对营销支出的评估应包括对营销对多个利益相关者的影响的考虑,而不仅仅是对消费者的销售影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号